Atheism,
 as it has always been, is not merely a denial of God but a criticism of
 the validity of any belief and religion. Atheism appears in many 
guises, and to help unravel its presence in our modern society, a 
priest, in a recent article in the Kyeongyang magazine, gives an 
overview of its growth as a movement throughout history. 
Atheism
 as a movement appeared at the time of Christianity. Before and outside 
of Christianity there were no movements that denied the existence of 
God, he says. Denials would come from individuals but not from groups of
 atheists. The priest points to the appearance on the intellectual scene
 of empiricism, positivism, the 'enlightenment' ideas, materialist 
evolution, and the like, as the impetus which turned atheism into a 
movement in Europe. 
Since atheism as a movement appeared within a 
Christian culture, Christianity can be considered responsible for its appearance and growth.
 
In
 ancient times and in the middle ages, the nature and existence of a 
transcendent being who created mankind, the world and the universe was 
the central concern of most scholars in those days. Though conflicts in 
Europe were not missing, it was basically one culture with a belief in 
one God, which created the conditions for a similar worldview. However, 
at the end of the middle ages, with the discoveries of science and a new
 appreciation of our intellectual understanding, there was a breakdown 
of the old ways of understanding and a movement to the new.
The
 signs of this new atheism began to be seen in the breakdown of the old 
religious order in society. In the 16th century, the divisions within 
the Church, the fighting between religious groups, and the general 
upheaval within the world of belief brought in relativism and apathy. 
There were also discoveries of new lands, a new understanding of the 
universe, and enlightenment ideas began to change our thinking. The move
 toward secularization helped to bring atheism to the attention of many,
 beginning with the so-called intellectuals, mostly in academia. They 
generally considered themselves the enlightened ones, the priest says, 
and took pride in overcoming the "infantile state of a humanity lost in 
religion."
Theology and religion, in those days, were seen as the 'light' and 'shade' of the intellectual quest. There were theologians who became atheists, and atheists who became theologians. Feuerbach and Nietzsche both started off as believers, he says, and became atheists, prime examples, in his view, of our modern atheists; Freud and Marx were both influenced by them. The modern movement started with a small group of intellectuals and attracted many followers. During the 19th century, its influence on society was substantial, and in the 20th century it became a strong political force in East Europe.
In the 1960-70s theology was on the 
defensive. Intellectuals were pointing to the works of Feuerbach, who considered religion a  
projection of our inner nature; to Marx, who considered it as opium;  and to Freud, who saw it as an infantile
 fantasy. It came to a draw, says our writer, and as we
 do not have the proof for the existence of God to convince atheists, neither do they have
 the proof for the non-existence of God. More 
important than proof for the existence of God for the Christian, he says, is a decision  and 
confession: a gift which they spend a lifetime to understand and give thanks. 
 
Theology and religion, in those days, were seen as the 'light' and 'shade' of the intellectual quest. There were theologians who became atheists, and atheists who became theologians. Feuerbach and Nietzsche both started off as believers, he says, and became atheists, prime examples, in his view, of our modern atheists; Freud and Marx were both influenced by them. The modern movement started with a small group of intellectuals and attracted many followers. During the 19th century, its influence on society was substantial, and in the 20th century it became a strong political force in East Europe.
Atheism
 has contributed a great deal to our
 theology, he says. (Which may be a surprising admission to some 
readers.) Because of their critical attacks, he says Christianity has 
been able to 
look at itself more closely and deal with a great many of the problems 
it has 
faced throughout its history, such as its tendency to individualism and 
idealism, to name only two. Atheistic criticism has become, he says, a 
part of the Church's legacy.
 
Looking
 over the history of the Church, seeing the problems and the scandals, 
we must, he says, acknowledge both the holiness and the sinfulness of 
the Church. As people of faith, we should dialogue with the atheists, 
for they help us to think clearly, stripping away the non-essentials.
He
 concludes the article with the words of a theologian, "The reason that 
the world is not changing is not because of any failure in the message 
of Jesus but because of our personal failures as Christians. The 
greatest refutation of Christianity is simply seeing the way many 
Christians live. The best way to promote Christianity is for Christians 
to begin living like Christians."            
No comments:
Post a Comment