"It is rare to see someone reading a book, while riding in a subway or train." A nun, who writes a column in the Catholic Times, on Media Ecology, begins her column with this observation, and attempts to verify it by 
peeking at those using their smart phones in her travels. Most of the 
time they were  watching drama, or playing a game, on occasions reading text, but the speed was such, she wondered if 
it could be called reading. 
She mentions studies
 that  showed readers of paper books had more retention than those 
reading e-books, easier to remember what they read, and  able to  give a
 decent report on what was read.  
The tendency with 
the  screen text makes it faster to read  but at the same time understanding and attention problems arise: words 
are simply passed over. In one elementary school the difference between 
the reading from a book and the electronic medium-- mistakes in 
understanding were three times more likely to happen.
Electronic
 books are appearing much more often today. We have
 ten times the number of e-books in our society compared to  3 and 4 years ago,  and this will  continue 
to grow. In California they are already saying paper books will disappear. In our own   country the government has shown a desire to quicken this with their policies.
She
 reminds us that reading is not only to search for knowledge  but 
especially these days we need training  to concentrate, and efforts made 
to develop endurance. In the 18th century with the reading revolution, it required the working together of the body and mind to do the 
difficult work of reading. The work required a change to our body 
and mind, and helped to develop the thinking process.
Books 
were not only the  containers of knowledge.  Paper books were 
uniting the sense of sight to that of touch, that conveyed the 
connection of these  dimensions of the person. When we fingered the 
pages we had the touch of hand and the sound of the turning of the page, 
the scent, the leisure  between the turning of the pages, weight of 
the book, which added to the satisfaction. Is this possible, she asks, 
with the electronic media?   
Here we have another example 
of technology and the great improvement in our way of living but at the 
same time we also should be conscious of a loss. The word Luddite in certain quarters has taken on a new 
meaning from the term used with those that found technology taking away their
 means of livelihood. However, for the modern Luddites, they see some of 
the negative aspects of our development.  
Would it not be a  sign of our wisdom to acknowledge the possibility, 
and do what we can to prevent some of the harm that comes with technology?
 
