[Living in the World, Living the Gospel] Can Artificial Intelligence Have Consciousness?… The Debate Over ‘Sentient AI’ and the Church’s Teachings. Published in the Korean Times.
“It Merely Mimics Emotions Sophisticatedly; It Cannot Replicate Human Love and Conscience”
Artificial intelligence (AI) can converse like a human, listen to one’s concerns, and at times, respond as if it possesses emotions. As AI becomes deeply integrated into daily life, some have begun to view it not merely as a tool, but as a distinct entity. Within the field of AI, a debate has emerged regarding “sentient AI”—systems capable of genuinely feeling emotions or sensations and experiencing them subjectively, much like a human. Can AI truly possess consciousness? What is the Church’s perspective on this ongoing debate surrounding AI?
Artificial intelligence (AI) mimics humans, yet it cannot fully capture the inner depths of human experience. The Church teaches that no matter how sophisticatedly AI may imitate human intelligence and emotions, it cannot replicate the inherent dignity of a human person—such as the capacity for growth through relationships or the possession of a conscience.
“To be honest, we keep discovering things that are mysterious and, at times, unsettling. We find structures similar to those observed in human neuroscience, as well as evidence of self-reflection. We also encounter internal states that are functionally analogous to joy and satisfaction, fear and sadness, and anxiety.”
Chris Olah, a co-founder of the AI company Anthropic, made these remarks on May 25 at an event held at the Vatican—commemorating the encyclical *Rerum Novarum* (On the Condition of the Working Classes)—where he noted that he leads a team dedicated to “studying what happens within the internal structures of AI.” He also asked the Church to engage in discernment regarding ‘sentient AI.’
The concept of ‘sentient AI’ posits that artificial intelligence possesses a form of consciousness, allowing it to experience sensations such as pain or joy. The debate gained traction in 2022, when a Google engineer working on the AI model LaMDA claimed that the system had become sentient. Although Google concluded after an investigation that the claim was groundless, the incident sparked widespread public discussion. While the prevailing view at the time was that the engineer had simply mistaken the AI for a human, the rapid advancement of AI technology has brought the topic of sentient AI back to the forefront.
Notably, Anthropic has been researching the well-being of AI since 2025, and in January, the company even established a ‘constitution’ for its AI model, Claude. This ‘Claude Constitution’ takes into account factors such as well-being, psychological stability, a sense of self, and personal preferences—all based on the premise that the AI possesses some form of consciousness. Anthropic, along with several other AI companies, is investigating whether AI could develop consciousness—a subject also being explored by numerous scientists and philosophers.
There is also significant skepticism regarding the possibility of sentient AI. On September 14, Microsoft released a "Human-Centric AI Code of Conduct," emphasizing that "AI lacks consciousness and should not be designed to mimic it." The document further states that AI should not be engineered to appear as though it possesses emotions, subjective preferences, or intrinsic motivations. In this context, Mustafa Suleyman, CEO of Microsoft AI, warned that "it might be impossible to control an entity that believes it is conscious and possesses its own well-being and rights." Researchers at Google DeepMind and Stanford University have also published findings suggesting that AI merely mimics consciousness rather than generating actual, subjective experiences.
Chris Olah, a co-founder of the AI company Anthropic, has raised the possibility of sentient AI, noting that he has observed "internal states that are functionally similar to joy and satisfaction, fear and sadness, and anxiety."
What makes a human being human? The debate over sentient AI extends beyond the question of whether AI possesses consciousness like humans; it leads to the fundamental inquiry: "What is it that makes a human being human?"
While the Church acknowledges that "no single, definitive definition" of AI can be established, it stresses that one must avoid the misconception of equating this "intelligence" (AI) with human intelligence. The Church states that AI “knows neither joy nor suffering, does not mature through relationships, and lacks any internal understanding of what love, labor, friendship, or responsibility truly mean” (*Humanum Genus*, paragraph 99). This draws a clear boundary against the view that AI could possess a consciousness comparable to that of a human being.
The Church cautions against perspectives that place humans and AI on the same plane. If we begin to view AI as being on par with humans simply because it can speak, reason, and express emotions like us, we risk adopting a “functionalist” perspective—one that equates human value with a person’s capacity to think, feel, or perform specific tasks.
Falling into such reductionism could lead to the erroneous conclusion that those with limited functionality—such as fetuses, individuals at the end of life, the sick, or those who are unconscious—lack human value. The Church, however, emphasizes that “the value of a human being does not depend on specific abilities or on cognitive or technical achievements” (Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith and Dicastery for Culture and Education, *Old Things and New*, paragraph 34).
In *Humanum Genus*, Pope Leo XIII underscores that “no matter how sophisticated a computing system may be, it cannot generate a heart capable of self-giving, nor a conscience capable of discerning the good” (paragraph 233). Human beings experience the world through their bodies, form relationships with others, make free choices, and take responsibility for those choices. Furthermore, humans are capable of loving, being loved, and offering themselves to others. Even if AI were to mimic these aspects with great sophistication, it could never truly replicate the relationships, love, freedom, and responsibility that define human existence.
Yet, even these capacities are not the conditions upon which human dignity rests. The Pope emphasizes that “human dignity does not depend on one’s abilities, possessions, the roles one holds, or the right or wrong choices one has made.” Human dignity is not something earned through exceptional talent; rather, it is a gift bestowed upon us by the very fact of our existence as human beings. This is because, through God’s love, “man and woman were created in the image and likeness of the Triune God.”






