Time
 is like the flowing river, one year flows out and another flows in. The
 desk columnist of the Catholic Times  introduces us to the Latin words 
Januarius and Janus, from which the month January takes its name. Janus,
 with his two faces pointing in opposite directions, was the Roman God 
of beginnings and ends, and fittingly names the month of January, which 
sees the end of the previous year and the beginning of the new year. 
Janus
 was also known as the God of the gate, the gatekeeper of the heavenly 
gate. The columnist describes the new year as throwing off the old and 
beginning afresh with new hope and joy. She remembers many words about 
bringing in the new year but the most memorable were the words of a 
sermon. The priest mentioned that at the beginning of the new year we 
should remember the words of Jesus to his disciples: "What I am doing is
 sending you out like sheep among wolves. You must be clever as snakes 
and innocent as doves" (Matt.10:16).
The
 intention of the sermon was to remind us that though we will have joy 
in the beginning of a new year, we need to remember that during the year
 we will meet rough and threatening times. There will be challenges, and
 the words of Jesus will be helpful in navigating through the year. The 
pack of wolves are ready to fight, armed with relativism, secularism and
 materialism. We who are Christians have to fight daily against this 
culture of death, which will require wisdom and simplicity.
The
 Korean Church has already sent out the warning signals concerning the  
dangers we will encounter in society, more so today than in anytime in  
the past. There is the glorification of material well-being, and 
conflict and division are not decreasing. We cry out for mutual 
understanding and compromise, but are most often met with confrontation 
and selfish attachment to one's position, and a society that seems 
unwilling to deal effectively with the rising tide of suicides and 
divorce, the crisis of family life and the problems with our youth.
Wise
 as serpents and simple as doves is good advice for us to remember as we
 go into the new year. Pope Francis has told us in his New Year's 
message that the keyword for establishing peace is fraternal charity 
among the world family.  Since we are all brothers and sister under God,
 fraternal love should be a governing instinct in our lives. However, 
because of the spread of egotism, secularism and consumerism many are 
becoming impoverished and alienated. When we begin to see these brothers
 and sister with fraternal love will we not be closer to world peace?
Pope
 Francis went on to say, in his message on World Peace Day, some 
powerful words  to remember as we greet the new year. "Fraternity is an 
essential human quality, for we are relational beings. A lively 
awareness of our relatedness helps us to look upon and to treat each 
person as a true sister or brother; without fraternity it is impossible 
to build a just society and a solid and lasting peace...." 
Wednesday, January 1, 2014
Tuesday, December 31, 2013
What Do We Mean by the Humanities?
The
 lack of interest in studying the humanities is the  reason for the many
 crises in society today, according to a professor emeritus writing in 
the Kyeongyang magazine. He even fears to read the newspapers, 
he says, with their many tragic tales of human  suffering. Why the many 
suicides, the break up of families and the other problems of society 
which are reported on a daily basis? The bonds that bind the members of a
 family--love, trust, understanding, sacrifice-- are, he says, as 
slippery as sand, difficult to hold on to, as we pursue worldly goods 
and honors.
He quotes Pope Francis: "The crisis is not a crisis of finances, or of culture but the crisis of being humans. Persons have fallen into crisis; we are destroying ourselves." The professor lists the many reasons he feels that these words speak the truth. Our culture should be helping us to attain a fuller life; however, money and ideology are putting on their armor and facing each other with violence.
We know what is happening to our environment: the waste products of industrialization have contaminated our ground, our water, our atmosphere, and is causing the disappearance of many animal species. Nietzsche is quoted as saying that humankind will remain as a useless virus on the face of the earth. There are those that agree with him, says the professor. These are just a few of the negative results of our material development.
Our culture is changing us, and not for the better. The professor divides our history into four periods: the ancient, the middle ages, the modern, and the present period. Each period had a particular method of education. The ancient Greeks and Romans aimed at bringing about a unity of mind and body, the cultivation, disciplining and improvement of the self.
During the middle ages, there was an emphasis away from attending to the needs of the individual to focusing more on achieving a relationship with God and religion. On the way to God, we are, he says, pilgrims in pursuit of understanding with faith, building character as we endeavor to lead a life of faith.
During the modern era, Europe went through great changes. The fighting among Christians brought about a devastation that brought despair to the lives of many. We went from God being the center of our lives to placing humanity once again in the center. With the Renascence, there was a return to the ancient times of the Greeks and Romans, and a desire to rebuild the dignity of the person with humanism. This was the beginning of the study of the humanities in college, and those who championed this method of study were called humanists.
Now that we have entered the present times, we are faced with an ongoing clash between divergent cultures and civilization, between what we are and what we have. We can no longer insist on one culture, one viewpoint, one way of seeing God or man. We have to learn how to live together.
He quotes Pope Francis: "The crisis is not a crisis of finances, or of culture but the crisis of being humans. Persons have fallen into crisis; we are destroying ourselves." The professor lists the many reasons he feels that these words speak the truth. Our culture should be helping us to attain a fuller life; however, money and ideology are putting on their armor and facing each other with violence.
We know what is happening to our environment: the waste products of industrialization have contaminated our ground, our water, our atmosphere, and is causing the disappearance of many animal species. Nietzsche is quoted as saying that humankind will remain as a useless virus on the face of the earth. There are those that agree with him, says the professor. These are just a few of the negative results of our material development.
Our culture is changing us, and not for the better. The professor divides our history into four periods: the ancient, the middle ages, the modern, and the present period. Each period had a particular method of education. The ancient Greeks and Romans aimed at bringing about a unity of mind and body, the cultivation, disciplining and improvement of the self.
During the middle ages, there was an emphasis away from attending to the needs of the individual to focusing more on achieving a relationship with God and religion. On the way to God, we are, he says, pilgrims in pursuit of understanding with faith, building character as we endeavor to lead a life of faith.
During the modern era, Europe went through great changes. The fighting among Christians brought about a devastation that brought despair to the lives of many. We went from God being the center of our lives to placing humanity once again in the center. With the Renascence, there was a return to the ancient times of the Greeks and Romans, and a desire to rebuild the dignity of the person with humanism. This was the beginning of the study of the humanities in college, and those who championed this method of study were called humanists.
Now that we have entered the present times, we are faced with an ongoing clash between divergent cultures and civilization, between what we are and what we have. We can no longer insist on one culture, one viewpoint, one way of seeing God or man. We have to learn how to live together.
Many thinkers acknowledge this situation, and they are looking for another way of being members of the human family. The professor believes we need a global humanities program, and then goes on to outline the Asian understanding of the person. Asia also has had an understanding of the humanities. There was a pattern for the human engraved within us, he says, just as there was a pattern for the heavens. This division appeared first in the Book of Changes (The I Ching). "Looking at the heavens we see change, looking at the pattern of humanity we see enlightenment." Asia has a tradition of poetry and ritual. We bring to fruition the pattern of life we have received by the life of truth and virtue.
In conclusion, he doesn't want Asia to follow along the path taken by the West. The West, he says, was interested in the intellect as seen from the male perspective. They forgot that women made up half of the world's population and that 70 percent live in the East.
The study of the humanities, both in the East and in the West, is to form a mature individual, a whole person. How to form the mature individual is what it is all about, to build for character. At present Korea has lost the idea of what education is meant to attain. The present aim is to get grades, pass the college entrance exam, make money. It is not interested in the formation of a mature person of character. It is time to make a change, a global change, in the way we go about educating our children.
Monday, December 30, 2013
Using to Abuse
In 
June of 2013, Korean TV ran the first advertisement for condoms. A young
 man is busy in the house attaching something to furniture and even to a
 tree outside the house. He hears the door bell ring and rushes to open 
the  front door. His girl friend outside has just dropped her handbag 
and is picking up the contents, which includes a pack of condoms made by
 the largest multinational in the field. 
Writing in the Kyeongyang magazine, a specialist in promoting the culture of life discusses the methods used in selling condoms in Korea. Referring to the ad, he asks: Why does it put two incompatible items together: a rosary ring on the finger of the girl friend as she leans down to pick up the contents of her bag, which contains a pack of condoms.
The obvious intention is to show the use of condoms in a positive light, a part of ordinary life. Though this attempt is easily accomplished with the younger generation in Korea, it is not so easy with the older generation. The marketing objective is clearly focused on desensitizing us from one way of thinking, and moving us along to another. The young girl, portrayed as a chaste, simple Catholic, has come to her boy friend's house prepared to have a "safe" sexual encounter.
All are familiar with the Church's teaching on premarital sex and artificial contraception--not exactly what would increase the bottom line for condom manufacturers, who feel the need to counter this influence--if they are to increase their share of the market--by ads that encourage sexual activity among those least likely to do so. The multinational is working to create a new type of culture. The writer shows this by the way they have treated the Catholic way of life in their advertisements in the West. One example shows a father of 12 children who he is calling them by name from a second story house window. Each one has a saint's name, and as he calls each one he begins to stumble in the middle of the name calling, finding it difficult to remember all the names. He wants them to come in to eat, and as the ad ends, we see the tired face of the father and the words: "If only he had known about condoms, he would not have had so many children to worry about."
 
Of course the company is not doing this in a vacuum: The Church's teaching is not taken seriously by the Catholics themselves. There is no need for a frontal attack on the Church when Catholics do not see any problem with condoms and premarital sex. More of a problem, he says, is aiming their words to the younger generation. In the advertising segment shown on TV, we are shown a young man, alone at home, attaching condoms all over the house and a tree outside, waiting for his girl friend to arrive for sex.
The writer recommends to parents a number of responses to this kind of advertising. First, to complain about the marketing of sex to the young. Second, be a wise consumer. Reckitt Benckiser, the maker of the condoms, makes many household articles, any of which could be the object of a shopper's boycott. (When one of their humidifiers recently caused the death of a number of children, there was no apology or compensation from the company.) Third, educating their children about the media (media literacy) is necessary. Showing sex as something without consequences is a lie, and should be exposed. Fourth, simply becoming more aware of the many conditioning forces surrounding us. We can excuse a commander who fails in battle, but one who has the job of protecting and doesn't do the job is something quite different. In the world of media, we have to be alert so as not to be deceived. The company is spending big money to silently educate viewers with their up-to-date tactics on how to influence us through the media. We also should be as wise in combating this assault on our values.
Writing in the Kyeongyang magazine, a specialist in promoting the culture of life discusses the methods used in selling condoms in Korea. Referring to the ad, he asks: Why does it put two incompatible items together: a rosary ring on the finger of the girl friend as she leans down to pick up the contents of her bag, which contains a pack of condoms.
The obvious intention is to show the use of condoms in a positive light, a part of ordinary life. Though this attempt is easily accomplished with the younger generation in Korea, it is not so easy with the older generation. The marketing objective is clearly focused on desensitizing us from one way of thinking, and moving us along to another. The young girl, portrayed as a chaste, simple Catholic, has come to her boy friend's house prepared to have a "safe" sexual encounter.
All are familiar with the Church's teaching on premarital sex and artificial contraception--not exactly what would increase the bottom line for condom manufacturers, who feel the need to counter this influence--if they are to increase their share of the market--by ads that encourage sexual activity among those least likely to do so. The multinational is working to create a new type of culture. The writer shows this by the way they have treated the Catholic way of life in their advertisements in the West. One example shows a father of 12 children who he is calling them by name from a second story house window. Each one has a saint's name, and as he calls each one he begins to stumble in the middle of the name calling, finding it difficult to remember all the names. He wants them to come in to eat, and as the ad ends, we see the tired face of the father and the words: "If only he had known about condoms, he would not have had so many children to worry about."
Of course the company is not doing this in a vacuum: The Church's teaching is not taken seriously by the Catholics themselves. There is no need for a frontal attack on the Church when Catholics do not see any problem with condoms and premarital sex. More of a problem, he says, is aiming their words to the younger generation. In the advertising segment shown on TV, we are shown a young man, alone at home, attaching condoms all over the house and a tree outside, waiting for his girl friend to arrive for sex.
The writer recommends to parents a number of responses to this kind of advertising. First, to complain about the marketing of sex to the young. Second, be a wise consumer. Reckitt Benckiser, the maker of the condoms, makes many household articles, any of which could be the object of a shopper's boycott. (When one of their humidifiers recently caused the death of a number of children, there was no apology or compensation from the company.) Third, educating their children about the media (media literacy) is necessary. Showing sex as something without consequences is a lie, and should be exposed. Fourth, simply becoming more aware of the many conditioning forces surrounding us. We can excuse a commander who fails in battle, but one who has the job of protecting and doesn't do the job is something quite different. In the world of media, we have to be alert so as not to be deceived. The company is spending big money to silently educate viewers with their up-to-date tactics on how to influence us through the media. We also should be as wise in combating this assault on our values.
Sunday, December 29, 2013
Hell is to Lose Hope
Korea's
 aging population is one of the fastest growing in the world. According 
to the standard of the United Nations, a country with over 7 percent of 
its population over 65 is considered an aging society, over 14 percent 
an aged society, and over 20 percent a super-aging society. 
  
Writing in the View from the Ark a professor uses these statistics to remind us of a situation in Korea we may not be familiar with. According to the statistics from last year, 11.8 percent of the population is over 65 years of age; in contrast, Catholics over 65 make up slightly more than 15 percent, which puts the Catholic community in the aged society category; a matter of some concern to the Korean Church.
The aging of the population is a serious problem, especially if one looks at the quality of life and degree of happiness that continues to spiral downward among the aged. After the ruin of the Korean War, all that the older generation was concerned with was the education of their children. They had to feed and prepare to educate them, even if it meant going hungry themselves. And because they spent their time helping their children, they were not able to prepare for retirement. Now, they don't have the energy, or the money, to take care of themselves, to deal with the inevitable sickness, economic problems and loneliness that are the normal lot of many of our elderly. As a consequence there has been an increase in the numbers who choose extreme solutions to their problems.
The reasons for putting an end to their life is varied, says the professor, but primary reason, he believes, is a sense of hopelessness. The lack of expectation and desire drives them to this stage of giving up, for in their eyes their life is no longer a life worth living. Without hope, life is a living hell; with hope we are already living the heavenly life.
He reminds us of the martyrs of Korea who suffered every kind of cruelty imaginable, and did not give in or lose hope. Faced with hunger in prison, they would take the mat on the floor of their prison room, which was made of straw, and use that for a meal. They hoped for a life after death with God. Looking forward to the joys of heaven and fearing the pains of hell, they were given strength to overcome all difficulties. Life on earth was to them no more than a flash of lightning.
The
 aged and all those who are nearing death are not to be seen as 
miserable creatures. They will be experiencing new life before the rest 
of us. They will be able to look ahead to a new life and 
calmly breathe peacefully. They can enjoy their present life and still 
dream of the better life to come. The words of Jesus give us life, and 
even if we are in a helpless situation his words give us strength and 
courage. He concludes the column with the last words of the Gospel of 
Matthew: "And know that I am with you always, until the end of the 
world!"
Writing in the View from the Ark a professor uses these statistics to remind us of a situation in Korea we may not be familiar with. According to the statistics from last year, 11.8 percent of the population is over 65 years of age; in contrast, Catholics over 65 make up slightly more than 15 percent, which puts the Catholic community in the aged society category; a matter of some concern to the Korean Church.
The aging of the population is a serious problem, especially if one looks at the quality of life and degree of happiness that continues to spiral downward among the aged. After the ruin of the Korean War, all that the older generation was concerned with was the education of their children. They had to feed and prepare to educate them, even if it meant going hungry themselves. And because they spent their time helping their children, they were not able to prepare for retirement. Now, they don't have the energy, or the money, to take care of themselves, to deal with the inevitable sickness, economic problems and loneliness that are the normal lot of many of our elderly. As a consequence there has been an increase in the numbers who choose extreme solutions to their problems.
The reasons for putting an end to their life is varied, says the professor, but primary reason, he believes, is a sense of hopelessness. The lack of expectation and desire drives them to this stage of giving up, for in their eyes their life is no longer a life worth living. Without hope, life is a living hell; with hope we are already living the heavenly life.
He reminds us of the martyrs of Korea who suffered every kind of cruelty imaginable, and did not give in or lose hope. Faced with hunger in prison, they would take the mat on the floor of their prison room, which was made of straw, and use that for a meal. They hoped for a life after death with God. Looking forward to the joys of heaven and fearing the pains of hell, they were given strength to overcome all difficulties. Life on earth was to them no more than a flash of lightning.
Saturday, December 28, 2013
Fraternal Charity Between the North and South
The 
primary reason, it is said, for the existence of the Korean military is 
the division of the country into two Koreas. Not only is this a big 
issue in politics, especially at election times, but it is related to 
many other issues: future meetings with the North, the North Limit Line 
(the disputed maritime demarcation line in the Yellow Sea between the 
North and the South), Mount Kumgang sightseeing, humanitarian aid to the
 North, family reunions, the National Intelligence Service, public 
security, left wing thinking, nuclear weapons, 6-party talks (Russia, China, Japan, USA, South and North Korea) and the like are all connected with the cold wind that blows from the North.
Writing in the With Bible
 magazine, a college professor reminds us that whenever these topics 
arise in talking about the North, it is usually accompanied with a  
feeling of hostility and hatred. Politics is not the only area of 
conflict which has developed because of the North/South debate. With the
 growing confrontation between contending parties, all Koreans are 
beginning to tire of the issue. 
There are things in life we can change and others that we can't. What we can't change, whether we like it or not, says the professor, we need to accept. And if what we can't change is from the past, we need to deal with that issue differently than it was handled in the past. The professor urges all of us to get rid of the baggage we carry from the past and work to change the feelings associated with that baggage.
Confucius told one of his disciples to be careful not to transfer one's anger to someone else. This advice is not easily followed, the professor admits, noting that passing along our anger to others is a common occurrence, and it usually gets transferred to those weakest among us. He hopes we can rid ourselves of the anger that comes from a difficult past relationship, so that we can begin to lay the foundation for bringing about a new relationship.
 
Statements like "a follower of the North...a friend of the North" are often used to brand another as somehow unpatriotic. But isn't that exactly what we should be trying to do?" he asks. Being a friend to a brother in trouble--is this not a sign of our humanity? Isn't this what we as Christians are supposed to do? Being friendly with the North is not something that should be criticized but something we should work to foster.
Love that is not expressed will not bear fruit. Seed that is not planted in the garden will not grow. Liberation does not come automatically. Salvation comes to us with the cross of Jesus. The difficulty with the North will not be resolved without effort. Instead of hate, we have to speak out for reconciliation and hope. We do not want to transfer our anger but foster patience and levelheadedness. This is not a time for hate but joy and fraternity. The message of restoration should be preached in the home, workplace, offices, and places of play. When spoken out forcefully everywhere, this message of hope and joy will be the way we change the static that comes from this long separation into something we all can embrace.
 
"Be bountiful, O Lord, to Zion, in your kindness, by rebuilding the walls of Jerusalem" (Ps 51:20). In the days to come, the mountain of the Lord's house shall be established as the highest mountain and raised above the hills. All nations shall stream toward it....They shall beat their swords into plowshares and their spears into pruning hooks. One nation shall not raise the sword against another, nor shall they train for war again" ( Isa 2: 2-4).
There are things in life we can change and others that we can't. What we can't change, whether we like it or not, says the professor, we need to accept. And if what we can't change is from the past, we need to deal with that issue differently than it was handled in the past. The professor urges all of us to get rid of the baggage we carry from the past and work to change the feelings associated with that baggage.
Confucius told one of his disciples to be careful not to transfer one's anger to someone else. This advice is not easily followed, the professor admits, noting that passing along our anger to others is a common occurrence, and it usually gets transferred to those weakest among us. He hopes we can rid ourselves of the anger that comes from a difficult past relationship, so that we can begin to lay the foundation for bringing about a new relationship.
Statements like "a follower of the North...a friend of the North" are often used to brand another as somehow unpatriotic. But isn't that exactly what we should be trying to do?" he asks. Being a friend to a brother in trouble--is this not a sign of our humanity? Isn't this what we as Christians are supposed to do? Being friendly with the North is not something that should be criticized but something we should work to foster.
Love that is not expressed will not bear fruit. Seed that is not planted in the garden will not grow. Liberation does not come automatically. Salvation comes to us with the cross of Jesus. The difficulty with the North will not be resolved without effort. Instead of hate, we have to speak out for reconciliation and hope. We do not want to transfer our anger but foster patience and levelheadedness. This is not a time for hate but joy and fraternity. The message of restoration should be preached in the home, workplace, offices, and places of play. When spoken out forcefully everywhere, this message of hope and joy will be the way we change the static that comes from this long separation into something we all can embrace.
"Be bountiful, O Lord, to Zion, in your kindness, by rebuilding the walls of Jerusalem" (Ps 51:20). In the days to come, the mountain of the Lord's house shall be established as the highest mountain and raised above the hills. All nations shall stream toward it....They shall beat their swords into plowshares and their spears into pruning hooks. One nation shall not raise the sword against another, nor shall they train for war again" ( Isa 2: 2-4).
Friday, December 27, 2013
Who is the Happy Person?
Goals and values in life are frequently different for each of us but beneath the goals and values is the same search for happiness, a desire that is inscribed in our human nature, says a seminary professor writing in the With Bible magazine.
By this desire for happiness, he believes we are showing our love for the world. Even though we experience quarreling, violence, oppression, pain, and sickness, we still love the world. What needs to be done, the professor says, is to distinguish between loving the world and being conditioned, manipulated by the world. Since we were born in the world, we have both the duty and the right to love the world. With this understanding, we have to define what we mean by happiness. Some think happiness comes from possessing material goods and honors; some think it comes from sharing.
Which is it? he asks his readers. There are workers who believe that a good, well-paying job will bring them happiness. And there are students who think that happiness comes with getting into their school of choice, and for untold numbers of people who struggle with a difficult situation, solving the difficulty would bring happiness to them. The understanding of happiness is different for each of us.
Thursday, December 26, 2013
Misuse of the Mass Media
The
 mass media in Korea, like the rest of the world, is subject to 
criticism for the way it transmits the news. In the Peace Weekly column 
on the Diagnosis of Current Events, the writer explores a 
serious problem in  journalism: the ideological battles that are given 
prominent exposure on front pages of newspapers and in opening remarks 
on news channels throughout the world. He considers this the primary 
reason for the divisions in society. Uplifting concepts like mutual 
respect and compromise, reconciliation, solidarity, trust, win-win 
outcomes, and peace are nowhere to be found. And when we look deeper, he
 says, beneath the maneuvering for advantages and power, we see an 
increase of ideology, not less, with a stubbornness of  will that 
refuses to give an inch. In such confrontations, the point at issue 
becomes clouded, the willingness to re-think positions disappears. News sources, often trying to get their readers to join their  
ideological stance, are further alienating many of their readers.  
As these efforts continue pitting one side against the other: conservatives against progressives, left against right, pro-Japanese against anti-Japanese, pro-Communist against anti-Communists, the battle between the different ideologies tends to intensify, fostering divisions and conflict within society.
The first obligation of media, according to the writer, is to present the facts accurately, objectively and fairly, and only then present their opinions. When discussing the same issue or event the facts should be the same, says the writer, as he reminds us of the saying of Confucius that we should be strictly fair when we criticize. But what frequently happens in presenting the news is the lack of differentiating between opinion and facts. If, for instance, it's reported that "Mr. Kim said the chances are great that (A) did it," it makes it seem this is the objective fact.
He then shows, with examples, how this is done in many news articles. Objective, accurate facts are not presented as such, but appear introduced by terms such as "often we hear...it was heard...it was said...it seems...one foresees." We are not told "who did the hearing...who said what...who sees and foresees." This is one way the news source makes it seem that the majority goes along with their understanding, thus confirming that they are a reliable news source.
The second obligation of media is not to
 abuse the use of anonymity of the news-gatherer. There are times this 
is required, but this is overly used by such reporting:as "a party 
concerned...a key person...a specialist...news services, and the like. 
When these terms are routinely used to promote the editorial policy of 
the paper,  there is likely to be a distortion of the news, and at times
 the paper creates a public personality, whose aspirations are most 
often political, and who supports the ideological position of the paper.
 
He concludes the column with a quote from Pope Francis: 'We must not be blinded by greed for profit and power." He goes on to plead for all those who at this time of Christmas are fighting over issues of advantages and power, and hopes sincerely that they will find peace.
As these efforts continue pitting one side against the other: conservatives against progressives, left against right, pro-Japanese against anti-Japanese, pro-Communist against anti-Communists, the battle between the different ideologies tends to intensify, fostering divisions and conflict within society.
The first obligation of media, according to the writer, is to present the facts accurately, objectively and fairly, and only then present their opinions. When discussing the same issue or event the facts should be the same, says the writer, as he reminds us of the saying of Confucius that we should be strictly fair when we criticize. But what frequently happens in presenting the news is the lack of differentiating between opinion and facts. If, for instance, it's reported that "Mr. Kim said the chances are great that (A) did it," it makes it seem this is the objective fact.
He then shows, with examples, how this is done in many news articles. Objective, accurate facts are not presented as such, but appear introduced by terms such as "often we hear...it was heard...it was said...it seems...one foresees." We are not told "who did the hearing...who said what...who sees and foresees." This is one way the news source makes it seem that the majority goes along with their understanding, thus confirming that they are a reliable news source.
He concludes the column with a quote from Pope Francis: 'We must not be blinded by greed for profit and power." He goes on to plead for all those who at this time of Christmas are fighting over issues of advantages and power, and hopes sincerely that they will find peace.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)
 
 
