In Korea where guns
are not permitted, the shooting incidents in the States remain a
mystery to many. The desk columnist of the
Catholic Times discusses the problem within the context of our own
culture.
He
mentions that in the States many people want to limit the selling of
firearms while others want the right to buy them without restrictive
laws curtailing what they believe is their constitutional right to do
so. Because of the possible enactment of measures controlling gun
purchases, there is now a hoarding of firearms and ammunition, with many
dealers saying they can't keep up with the demand. All this happening
despite the recent shooting deaths of 20 children while attending kindergarten class. He
attributes this to the western frontier mentality of many Americans who feel a need
to possess weapons. He also
acknowledges that many citizens are influenced by the gun lobby: the
politics of money. Even though the majority of the people, according to the latest polls, are for a
change in the possession of guns, he believes the influential sectors of society will
militate against change.
The columnist refers to the book Who Rules America?
by William Domhoff as representative of the thinking of many that the
wealthy and the powerful
are in control. To protect their interests, Domhoff says they have
easier access to the most current information coming from research
centers, foundations, and ad hoc commissions, and from insider
information from international big
business sources, among others. This is
not done in any covert way but is legal and easily seen.
No
matter how certain segments of society feel about this state of
affairs, the privileged groups within society will have control,
according to Domhoff, and the hope for change is
minimal.
In Korea we also have certain things that will
not change. Still very much in evidence are the old regional
differences, the bonds of political and economic friendships among the
elite classes,
the preeminent place and concessions given to the conglomerates in our
economic structure, a general unconcern of the government with the
common people, and at times the unmerciful unconcern of the most vulnerable in our society. Overall, there is
seen a lack of will by our lawmakers to change in any meaningful way the
status quo.
What about our
religious life? he asks. Looking at his own life, he admits that if he has no personal experience of the truth of what he is asked to believe,
or has not seen sufficient scientific evidence for its truth, then the
difficulty of giving wholehearted response keeps
appearing. Along with this, he believes our mental laziness often
prevents us from participating with enthusiasm when we do believe.
What
do we understand by community? As Catholics, we believe, he says, that
we are a community that has been saved, and yet remain passive, without a
sense of meaning, looking for consolation and a faith life that seeks
to evade its requirements. We bury out of sight our Christian vision of
life. And our clergy often finds it difficult to adapt to the times,
holding on to a form of clericalism. More so than at any time in the
past, the columnist believes that Catholicism in Korea is in need of
reform, renewal and repentance.
Will this be more difficult to
accomplish for the Church in Korea, or easier, than it will be for the
States to do something about ending gun violence? It may depend, he
says, on how serious we are about this year of faith that we are in the
process
of living?