On
the opinion page of the Catholic Times, a seminary professor, a priest,
mentions having read a book by the music conductor and composer Leonard
Bernstein, The Unanswered
Question, 20 years ago, and the thoughts from that reading still
linger in mind. Although he knows little about music, he found
Bernstein's explanations of music, its history and literature totally
enjoyable, not only
because of what he learned, but because of the ease of communication.
Here was a master musician who was continually questioning himself about
the role of music in life, and
was also able to communicate that interest to others who know little
about the subject.
Today the professor says it's difficult to find an expert who can communicate truth persuasively, because the sphere of knowledge is so extensive. But also because the organization of knowledge has been divided, fragmented, relativized and specialized. Often the experts are not able to "see the forest for the trees," he claims, because of the way they have privatized their knowledge and their relationship with power, which makes it difficult to talk about things as they are.
Today the professor says it's difficult to find an expert who can communicate truth persuasively, because the sphere of knowledge is so extensive. But also because the organization of knowledge has been divided, fragmented, relativized and specialized. Often the experts are not able to "see the forest for the trees," he claims, because of the way they have privatized their knowledge and their relationship with power, which makes it difficult to talk about things as they are.
Two
examples
were given concerning government policy; in one case, either the experts
were silent or gave
answers to questions that were meant to shut up the opposition. If one
speaks up with words of criticism, they are quickly labeled as anti
government leftists. And there is the case where government wants the
trust of the citizens without good reason, and the experts are nowhere
to be found or are unwilling to speak the truth, resulting in an
irrational situation.
He
brings us back to the time of Christ and the experts of that age: the
lawyers of the law, and wants us to look at their
way of life. Similarities between the experts back then and now are
easily seen, he says. They were interested in making themselves known
and
advancing their personal greed; they were experts in sophistry. They
labeled those who wanted freedom and more personal responsibility with
the term sinner.
They shackled the aspirations of the people with their
letter-of-the-law approach to life and made God partake of their
wrong-headed interpretations. This is why Jesus called them a brood of
vipers.
Those who have built up a reputation for expertise and are endowed with the name "expert" are not considered so for their own private needs. They are not to bow to special interests or give in to temptations but are to search for truth and to free us from ignorance, prejudice, error, liberating us from abuses, helping us to become better persons and working for a better world. This will win the respect of all.
And yet we should be aware, says the professor, that there are those who stand out in society as capable and wise, says the professor, who have led many astray and are doing a lot of harm. Their expert opinions often appear in the media, giving a false understanding of events, hiding the truth for reasons that are far from laudable.
Those who have built up a reputation for expertise and are endowed with the name "expert" are not considered so for their own private needs. They are not to bow to special interests or give in to temptations but are to search for truth and to free us from ignorance, prejudice, error, liberating us from abuses, helping us to become better persons and working for a better world. This will win the respect of all.
And yet we should be aware, says the professor, that there are those who stand out in society as capable and wise, says the professor, who have led many astray and are doing a lot of harm. Their expert opinions often appear in the media, giving a false understanding of events, hiding the truth for reasons that are far from laudable.