Atheism,
as it has always been, is not merely a denial of God but a criticism of
the validity of any belief and religion. Atheism appears in many
guises, and to help unravel its presence in our modern society, a
priest, in a recent article in the Kyeongyang magazine, gives an
overview of its growth as a movement throughout history.
Atheism
as a movement appeared at the time of Christianity. Before and outside
of Christianity there were no movements that denied the existence of
God, he says. Denials would come from individuals but not from groups of
atheists. The priest points to the appearance on the intellectual scene
of empiricism, positivism, the 'enlightenment' ideas, materialist
evolution, and the like, as the impetus which turned atheism into a
movement in Europe.
Since atheism as a movement appeared within a
Christian culture, Christianity can be considered responsible for its appearance and growth.
In
ancient times and in the middle ages, the nature and existence of a
transcendent being who created mankind, the world and the universe was
the central concern of most scholars in those days. Though conflicts in
Europe were not missing, it was basically one culture with a belief in
one God, which created the conditions for a similar worldview. However,
at the end of the middle ages, with the discoveries of science and a new
appreciation of our intellectual understanding, there was a breakdown
of the old ways of understanding and a movement to the new.
The
signs of this new atheism began to be seen in the breakdown of the old
religious order in society. In the 16th century, the divisions within
the Church, the fighting between religious groups, and the general
upheaval within the world of belief brought in relativism and apathy.
There were also discoveries of new lands, a new understanding of the
universe, and enlightenment ideas began to change our thinking. The move
toward secularization helped to bring atheism to the attention of many,
beginning with the so-called intellectuals, mostly in academia. They
generally considered themselves the enlightened ones, the priest says,
and took pride in overcoming the "infantile state of a humanity lost in
religion."
Theology and religion, in those days, were seen as the 'light' and 'shade' of the intellectual quest. There were theologians who became atheists, and atheists who became theologians. Feuerbach and Nietzsche both started off as believers, he says, and became atheists, prime examples, in his view, of our modern atheists; Freud and Marx were both influenced by them. The modern movement started with a small group of intellectuals and attracted many followers. During the 19th century, its influence on society was substantial, and in the 20th century it became a strong political force in East Europe.
In the 1960-70s theology was on the
defensive. Intellectuals were pointing to the works of Feuerbach, who considered religion a
projection of our inner nature; to Marx, who considered it as opium; and to Freud, who saw it as an infantile
fantasy. It came to a draw, says our writer, and as we
do not have the proof for the existence of God to convince atheists, neither do they have
the proof for the non-existence of God. More
important than proof for the existence of God for the Christian, he says, is a decision and
confession: a gift which they spend a lifetime to understand and give thanks.
Theology and religion, in those days, were seen as the 'light' and 'shade' of the intellectual quest. There were theologians who became atheists, and atheists who became theologians. Feuerbach and Nietzsche both started off as believers, he says, and became atheists, prime examples, in his view, of our modern atheists; Freud and Marx were both influenced by them. The modern movement started with a small group of intellectuals and attracted many followers. During the 19th century, its influence on society was substantial, and in the 20th century it became a strong political force in East Europe.
Atheism
has contributed a great deal to our
theology, he says. (Which may be a surprising admission to some
readers.) Because of their critical attacks, he says Christianity has
been able to
look at itself more closely and deal with a great many of the problems
it has
faced throughout its history, such as its tendency to individualism and
idealism, to name only two. Atheistic criticism has become, he says, a
part of the Church's legacy.
Looking
over the history of the Church, seeing the problems and the scandals,
we must, he says, acknowledge both the holiness and the sinfulness of
the Church. As people of faith, we should dialogue with the atheists,
for they help us to think clearly, stripping away the non-essentials.
He
concludes the article with the words of a theologian, "The reason that
the world is not changing is not because of any failure in the message
of Jesus but because of our personal failures as Christians. The
greatest refutation of Christianity is simply seeing the way many
Christians live. The best way to promote Christianity is for Christians
to begin living like Christians."