'Future change' seems to be here now, permeating our present life and doing so at super-speed, says a writer in the diocesan bulletin. Using the words of a futurist, he wants us to be conscious of this reality. If we decide to ignore what is happening, content to "walk in place," as he puts it, we will be fighting against this change and not be ready for living in the twenty-first century.
One of the big changes now is the aging of society. Economic development and scientific discoveries, along with the low birthrate, have brought this about, he says. According to the office of government statistics, our country is already an aging society. When a country has 7 percent of the population over 65 years of age, that is the accepted sign that we are an aging society; if over 14 percent, we are called an aged-society; over 21 percent, we are called a super-aged society. Korea is one of the fastest aging societies and will be the fastest such society in 2018. In 2026, it is predicted to reach the super-aged society.
Compared
to other societies, it will take us less time to reach an aged-society, the writer believes.
It took France 115 years to go from an aging society to an
aged-society. Sweden in 1973 became the first aged-society; it took them
85 years for that to happen.
Japan took 26 years; He believes it will take Korea only 18 years.
What
does this mean for the Catholic Church in Korea? he asks. The Church
has already gone ahead of society in becoming aged. Church
statistics in 2011 showed that the aging of Church members was 4.5 percent higher than
society at large. In 2022, over 30 percent of Catholics
will be more than 65 years old. This means that the numbers of the zealous and
dependable parishioners will be in this group, and if they are excluded as active members of the Church because of age,
we will have difficulty finding those who will do volunteer work in the Church.
If
this group of the aged is going to be a concern of the
community, as needing the care of the community, then there will be
serious
problems for the community to continue its pastoral work and services.
It is
even now difficult to find laity who are willing to be
members of the parish council, or leaders of the small communities, or
members of parish societies, and become involved in parish work. It will also
be difficult to find women able to help out in the parish, as
they have done so generously in the past because of work outside the home. With these likely future
problems close at hand, it is easy to see what the church will be faced
with in a
short period of time.
The Church has spent money and time in determining how to work with the young; it is now time to see the aged as a pastoral concern. Up until now, it has not been an issue, but this will soon change. Priests will have to be educated in this area of pastoral work while still in the seminary. For those in pastoral work, we will need seminars and educational programs to help change how we currently see and respond to our senior citizens.
Sunday, March 17, 2013
Saturday, March 16, 2013
Am I the Authentic Person I am meant to be?
Recently, one of
our diplomats was stopped by a policeman for drunken driving, and the
individual in anger said to the policeman: Do you know who I am? Writing
in a pastoral bulletin, the priest recalled a time when such responses
were not rare. He has never experienced this kind of talk but has heard
of persons using their position in society to crudely put down others.
The priest from his time in the seminary has been interested in the nature of personal identity: What does a person consider himself to be? What is he or she conscious of? Who am I? What is a Christian? What is a priest? Our diplomat, by his remark, was showing, says the priest, that he was not conscious of his true identity.
A diplomat residing in the country to which he is sent is expected to represent his mother country with prudence and discretion. By driving under the influence of liquor, he not only forgot the need to behave responsibly, as expected from someone in his position, but he attempted to use his position to escape the legitimate penalty of breaking a law of the country.
The priest remembers the words heard in a recent liturgy, from Jeremiah: "Teaching will not perish for want of a priest, nor will there be a lack of wise men to give counsel, or prophets to proclaim the word." These words of those who were plotting against Jeremiah made an impression on the writer. Predominating nowadays in those who have a faith life is peace of mind instead of liberation and salvation. He wonders about his own motivation.
Repentance is not a place we want to remain in; leaving it behind we must return, he says, to our Lord. The priest wonders whether his life is filled with speaking flowery words and encouraging vague actions to those who are feeling discomfit and are anxious to hear such words. Is he at times uttering words like a false prophet? he wonders.
Lent is a time to look at the unwise choices we have made and determine to rectify our relationship with our Lord. We do not ask the kind of question the diplomat asked, but instead ask ourselves, who am I? During this Lent, the priest wants to make sure that he is in touch with the real person that he was meant to be.
The recent election of Pope Francis has already revealed many signs of the kind of person our next pope is and will continue to be. We will gradually see how this translates into the words and actions of his pontificate. Hopefully, the criticisms of the way he acted in the past, in very serious circumstances, will not detract from the current and forthcoming words and actions of the Pope, preventing us from seeing him as the truly authentic person he appears to be, and we all wish to be.
The priest from his time in the seminary has been interested in the nature of personal identity: What does a person consider himself to be? What is he or she conscious of? Who am I? What is a Christian? What is a priest? Our diplomat, by his remark, was showing, says the priest, that he was not conscious of his true identity.
A diplomat residing in the country to which he is sent is expected to represent his mother country with prudence and discretion. By driving under the influence of liquor, he not only forgot the need to behave responsibly, as expected from someone in his position, but he attempted to use his position to escape the legitimate penalty of breaking a law of the country.
The priest remembers the words heard in a recent liturgy, from Jeremiah: "Teaching will not perish for want of a priest, nor will there be a lack of wise men to give counsel, or prophets to proclaim the word." These words of those who were plotting against Jeremiah made an impression on the writer. Predominating nowadays in those who have a faith life is peace of mind instead of liberation and salvation. He wonders about his own motivation.
Repentance is not a place we want to remain in; leaving it behind we must return, he says, to our Lord. The priest wonders whether his life is filled with speaking flowery words and encouraging vague actions to those who are feeling discomfit and are anxious to hear such words. Is he at times uttering words like a false prophet? he wonders.
Lent is a time to look at the unwise choices we have made and determine to rectify our relationship with our Lord. We do not ask the kind of question the diplomat asked, but instead ask ourselves, who am I? During this Lent, the priest wants to make sure that he is in touch with the real person that he was meant to be.
The recent election of Pope Francis has already revealed many signs of the kind of person our next pope is and will continue to be. We will gradually see how this translates into the words and actions of his pontificate. Hopefully, the criticisms of the way he acted in the past, in very serious circumstances, will not detract from the current and forthcoming words and actions of the Pope, preventing us from seeing him as the truly authentic person he appears to be, and we all wish to be.
Friday, March 15, 2013
Missing Element in Formation of Christians
"Religious education is seen as a means of deepening our faith life, but in reality the
reason for the education is to have an intimate personal relationship
with Jesus. " With these words a seminary professor begins his interview
with the Catholic Times.
Before we make an assessment on our religious education programs, he said we have to decide on the meaning and object of religious education. For those who do not know Jesus, these programs, he explains, are a means of introducing them to the good news, to the gospel message, in order that they might more easily give themselves wholly to Jesus and to understand more fully what he teaches.
The professor feels that the greatest difficulty with religious education is that many do not feel a need for it, no matter how much effort is expended on such programs. Secular values are more important, and even if there is some awareness of the need for more religious education, secular values take precedence. Many feel no serious disadvantage in not knowing more than they presently know about the spiritual life. The pace of modern life does not allow the opportunity or the time to do any deep reflection.
Another way of describing the situation is to say that we get our religious education at church, our knowledge from school, and our common sense from daily life. This is the way we bring stress into our lives by dividing life into compartments. The religious education that children used to get in the home in years past, as an antidote to a compartmentalized life, is no longer the case. Now it is expected that the Church will take care of this area of life.
The whole person has to grow in knowledge, in ethical behavior and spirituality is rarely a concern. When we see growth in maturity as many faceted and our way of thinking becomes less directed to the individual and more communal, we will see a religious education that will begin in the home, where it should begin.
At present, there is no ongoing system of religious education for our Christians that begins in infancy and goes on to old age. This has to begin by putting in place a welcoming environment and encouraging personal desire. The present situation in Korea, however, is that there is a lack of commitment, a failure to live the faith we say we believe in. The numbers that have dropped out from the community, the decrease in Mass attendance and of sacramental life, all point to something seriously wrong with the faith life of our Catholics.
A clear understanding of what it means to be a Catholic is missing in the lives of many. The content of our tradition is enormous and the lives of those who have lived it well are recorded, but a desire on the part of many to emulate what has been handed down to us to follow is missing. This 'Year of Faith' will continue to bring many more thoughts to the mix, which will undoubtedly bring a change to our parish life and the way we go about forming our Christians.
Before we make an assessment on our religious education programs, he said we have to decide on the meaning and object of religious education. For those who do not know Jesus, these programs, he explains, are a means of introducing them to the good news, to the gospel message, in order that they might more easily give themselves wholly to Jesus and to understand more fully what he teaches.
The professor feels that the greatest difficulty with religious education is that many do not feel a need for it, no matter how much effort is expended on such programs. Secular values are more important, and even if there is some awareness of the need for more religious education, secular values take precedence. Many feel no serious disadvantage in not knowing more than they presently know about the spiritual life. The pace of modern life does not allow the opportunity or the time to do any deep reflection.
Another way of describing the situation is to say that we get our religious education at church, our knowledge from school, and our common sense from daily life. This is the way we bring stress into our lives by dividing life into compartments. The religious education that children used to get in the home in years past, as an antidote to a compartmentalized life, is no longer the case. Now it is expected that the Church will take care of this area of life.
The whole person has to grow in knowledge, in ethical behavior and spirituality is rarely a concern. When we see growth in maturity as many faceted and our way of thinking becomes less directed to the individual and more communal, we will see a religious education that will begin in the home, where it should begin.
At present, there is no ongoing system of religious education for our Christians that begins in infancy and goes on to old age. This has to begin by putting in place a welcoming environment and encouraging personal desire. The present situation in Korea, however, is that there is a lack of commitment, a failure to live the faith we say we believe in. The numbers that have dropped out from the community, the decrease in Mass attendance and of sacramental life, all point to something seriously wrong with the faith life of our Catholics.
A clear understanding of what it means to be a Catholic is missing in the lives of many. The content of our tradition is enormous and the lives of those who have lived it well are recorded, but a desire on the part of many to emulate what has been handed down to us to follow is missing. This 'Year of Faith' will continue to bring many more thoughts to the mix, which will undoubtedly bring a change to our parish life and the way we go about forming our Christians.
Thursday, March 14, 2013
Metanoia
The faces of many
Catholics at Mass are not happy faces, says the columnist writing on
spirituality for the Catholic Times. An example of this sad situation
that readily came to mind was a person he knew; she was living a life
without hope because of the pressure of sin. The only word uppermost on
her mind was repentance.
Of course, this is different for all, he reminds us. Some see themselves with 10 percent negativity (sin) in their lives, and others see 80 percent. The experience of sin will be different for everyone according to the lifestyle of each one. Those who are dealing with 10 percent failure should look upon the 90 percent and give thanks; those who have 80 percent to deal with should quickly break the surrounding darkness to get to the light.
Educational programs for those in prison may be best advised not to focus too directly on having sorrow for what was done, he says. Repentance for what we have sinfully done is healthy, but we know that those who want to change do not find it easy to do so. Better it is, he says, to accept our weaknesses and rely on our spiritual faculties to come to our aid. It takes time for some changes to occur, especially when we have been overcome by our faults.
To be sorry for our sins is important but change is also important. Let us consider, he suggests, a husband who drinks and often shouts at his wife. He goes to confession and pledges he will not be violent in his behavior again. The chances are 9 out of 10 that within a week or a month he will be back at his old ways, regardless of the sorrow he felt at the time of his confession.
One step beyond sorrow, the columnist says, is to have an inner change, a spiritual renewal. Something different has to take place within the person. It is good to remember that the word we translate into the different languages to mean repentance is the Greek word 'metanoia', which means a 'changed mind'. This change will not come easily; we need God's help to make this happen, to give us a new way of looking at life, a new way of living our lives. Without this new way we will continue to return to the past. We have to forget the past (it's no longer here), We have to make the past come into the present and be directed towards the future. This is the work of the spirit.
God, the columnist reminds us, does not bind us to the the sins of the past. He released Israel from Egypt and again from Babylon captivity. We need not be chained to the past. We acknowledge what was done but then must move on. If we spend too much time in the past we will become exhausted; we have to move to another level and give ourselves over to a new spiritual energy to change. We have to experience God, and that can only be done here, now. By experiencing God, says the columnist, we will resonate with the strength that he gives us, without this we will have more vacillation.
Of course, this is different for all, he reminds us. Some see themselves with 10 percent negativity (sin) in their lives, and others see 80 percent. The experience of sin will be different for everyone according to the lifestyle of each one. Those who are dealing with 10 percent failure should look upon the 90 percent and give thanks; those who have 80 percent to deal with should quickly break the surrounding darkness to get to the light.
Educational programs for those in prison may be best advised not to focus too directly on having sorrow for what was done, he says. Repentance for what we have sinfully done is healthy, but we know that those who want to change do not find it easy to do so. Better it is, he says, to accept our weaknesses and rely on our spiritual faculties to come to our aid. It takes time for some changes to occur, especially when we have been overcome by our faults.
To be sorry for our sins is important but change is also important. Let us consider, he suggests, a husband who drinks and often shouts at his wife. He goes to confession and pledges he will not be violent in his behavior again. The chances are 9 out of 10 that within a week or a month he will be back at his old ways, regardless of the sorrow he felt at the time of his confession.
One step beyond sorrow, the columnist says, is to have an inner change, a spiritual renewal. Something different has to take place within the person. It is good to remember that the word we translate into the different languages to mean repentance is the Greek word 'metanoia', which means a 'changed mind'. This change will not come easily; we need God's help to make this happen, to give us a new way of looking at life, a new way of living our lives. Without this new way we will continue to return to the past. We have to forget the past (it's no longer here), We have to make the past come into the present and be directed towards the future. This is the work of the spirit.
God, the columnist reminds us, does not bind us to the the sins of the past. He released Israel from Egypt and again from Babylon captivity. We need not be chained to the past. We acknowledge what was done but then must move on. If we spend too much time in the past we will become exhausted; we have to move to another level and give ourselves over to a new spiritual energy to change. We have to experience God, and that can only be done here, now. By experiencing God, says the columnist, we will resonate with the strength that he gives us, without this we will have more vacillation.
Wednesday, March 13, 2013
What Make Us Beautiful?
"One need not adorn
the beauty that we have" begins an article by a priest writing in a
diocesan bulletin. He selects a number of commentaries by a famous
vocalist and a judge of auditions for
vocalists on TV that he
believes important for those who intend to follow a singing career. "A
vocalist should not dislike their voice....If the
vocalist is not familiar with their voice they will not sing well....The
vocalist should not try to imitate the original singer of the
song....More important than singing well is to convey what the vocalist
wishes to express in the song....The tone-color of the voice,
and what that is able to convey is more important than singing
well."
Simply expressed, the priest says, when we sing with our voice and from the heart without adornment we are being authentic, and those listening will be moved. We want always to be ourselves, to love ourselves, and to express this in our singing--that is what is important.
Applying this advice to life, the priest goes on to say that we should at all times strive to be authentic and avoid being a copy of what we would like to be. We are made by God and loved and are his masterpieces (Ephesian 2:10). We are precious, loved by God and need to love ourselves, which will enable us to be more free in whatever we are doing. God will then be able to work through us to accomplish his plans.
There is nothing we need do to receive God's love or to be considered precious.That is our birthright, he says. We can however refuse the love and ignore our preciousness. We are not changed into a person that is precious; we are precious to begin with, and that is the reason we do not need to adorn who we are.
The priest ends his article by adding another statement of the vocalist: "We are not beautiful because we were born so, but because we lose ourselves in what we love; that is what makes us beautiful. This has nothing to do with our exterior." We are beautiful because we love ourselves, because we love others, and because we love God. When we sincerely love others, everybody becomes beautiful, regardless of what they may appear to be.
Anything said can be used in a way that fails to understand what was intended, and consequently becomes distorted. His article, if understood correctly, is not recommending vanity, self-absorption, or any unhealthy self-esteem. It recommends understanding who we are and doing away with the obstacles that prevent God's love from being accepted. His love will enable us to respond with love. When God is in the picture, whatever aberrations of unhealthy self-love remain are controlled. "Whoever does not love does not know God, for God is love" (1 John 4:8).
Simply expressed, the priest says, when we sing with our voice and from the heart without adornment we are being authentic, and those listening will be moved. We want always to be ourselves, to love ourselves, and to express this in our singing--that is what is important.
Applying this advice to life, the priest goes on to say that we should at all times strive to be authentic and avoid being a copy of what we would like to be. We are made by God and loved and are his masterpieces (Ephesian 2:10). We are precious, loved by God and need to love ourselves, which will enable us to be more free in whatever we are doing. God will then be able to work through us to accomplish his plans.
There is nothing we need do to receive God's love or to be considered precious.That is our birthright, he says. We can however refuse the love and ignore our preciousness. We are not changed into a person that is precious; we are precious to begin with, and that is the reason we do not need to adorn who we are.
The priest ends his article by adding another statement of the vocalist: "We are not beautiful because we were born so, but because we lose ourselves in what we love; that is what makes us beautiful. This has nothing to do with our exterior." We are beautiful because we love ourselves, because we love others, and because we love God. When we sincerely love others, everybody becomes beautiful, regardless of what they may appear to be.
Anything said can be used in a way that fails to understand what was intended, and consequently becomes distorted. His article, if understood correctly, is not recommending vanity, self-absorption, or any unhealthy self-esteem. It recommends understanding who we are and doing away with the obstacles that prevent God's love from being accepted. His love will enable us to respond with love. When God is in the picture, whatever aberrations of unhealthy self-love remain are controlled. "Whoever does not love does not know God, for God is love" (1 John 4:8).
Tuesday, March 12, 2013
Importance of Communication Within the Church
The general meeting
of all the archdiocesan priests clearly showed that communication was
an important issue, that increasing understanding between the diocese
and priests will be an
ongoing concern. The archbishop, Yeom Soo-jung, is quoted as saying he
thought he
should always be solemn but communicating is wonderful. He has made this an important value in the way the work of
the archdiocese will be conducted, with more use of the digital media.
Both the Social network services (SNS) and the participation of the archbishop were warmly praised by the priests and Christians. There will be a Korean and an English version of the Facebook page.
Korean: www.facebook.com/seoul.archdiocese.kr.
English: www.facebook.com/seoul.archdiocese.eng.
The intention is to inform the archdiocese of what has been planned, including the archbishop's informal daily plans. It is an attempt to realize the desire for more communication within the diocese: between the archbishop and priests, among the priests, and between the diocese and laity. In the past, the means of communication were few; now with the digital possibilities available, this will change.
With the English Facebook page, information will be available to all who are interested in the Korean Church, wherever they may be. It will also enable news to come more easily to the Korean Church. The efforts that have been made to communicate have been taken seriously. This should affect how the dioceses will function in the future.
The Peace Weekly interviewed the archbishop concerning the views expressed at the general meeting. He thanked all the priests for their comments during the meeting. The interviewer asked him to say more about how he would improve the lines of communication between pastors and their assistants, and between pastors and the laity. Jesus was an expert communicator, the archbishop said. Jesus told his disciples that what they wanted from others, they were first to do to others. To be a good communicator, he said, is to understand what the other person wants to say, to be concerned, and to strive to understand the position of the other person. More important than expressing your opinion, or to convince the other of your thinking, is to listen with sympathy to what the other has to say.
The Archbishop has not only expressed himself very clearly on his efforts to be open to everybody, but has also taken steps that show he is earnest about doing what he preaches. At a meeting of 100 or so diocesan society members, he listened patiently and encouraged them as they made their reports. He later said Mass for the group.
Both the Social network services (SNS) and the participation of the archbishop were warmly praised by the priests and Christians. There will be a Korean and an English version of the Facebook page.
Korean: www.facebook.com/seoul.archdiocese.kr.
English: www.facebook.com/seoul.archdiocese.eng.
The intention is to inform the archdiocese of what has been planned, including the archbishop's informal daily plans. It is an attempt to realize the desire for more communication within the diocese: between the archbishop and priests, among the priests, and between the diocese and laity. In the past, the means of communication were few; now with the digital possibilities available, this will change.
With the English Facebook page, information will be available to all who are interested in the Korean Church, wherever they may be. It will also enable news to come more easily to the Korean Church. The efforts that have been made to communicate have been taken seriously. This should affect how the dioceses will function in the future.
The Peace Weekly interviewed the archbishop concerning the views expressed at the general meeting. He thanked all the priests for their comments during the meeting. The interviewer asked him to say more about how he would improve the lines of communication between pastors and their assistants, and between pastors and the laity. Jesus was an expert communicator, the archbishop said. Jesus told his disciples that what they wanted from others, they were first to do to others. To be a good communicator, he said, is to understand what the other person wants to say, to be concerned, and to strive to understand the position of the other person. More important than expressing your opinion, or to convince the other of your thinking, is to listen with sympathy to what the other has to say.
The Archbishop has not only expressed himself very clearly on his efforts to be open to everybody, but has also taken steps that show he is earnest about doing what he preaches. At a meeting of 100 or so diocesan society members, he listened patiently and encouraged them as they made their reports. He later said Mass for the group.
Monday, March 11, 2013
Sant'Egidio in Korea
Prayer, they were told, is at the center of their community life, as well as spreading the Gospel message to all who are seeking to live a meaningful life, in solidarity with the poor, in voluntary and gratuitous service. The movement started in 1968, when a young man, Andrea Riccardi, only 19 years old, along with a group of high-school students, decided to put the words of the Gospel into practice, very much like the beginnings of the Church in the Acts of the Apostles.
After hearing the brief history of the movement, and following a question and answer period, they went to the Martyr's shrine in Seoul for Mass, where the priest, during the sermon, stressed that a distinguishing mark of the Sant'Egidio community was to take attention off themselves and direct their attention to God. The movement in Korea has started with few members, he said, but with God's grace we will see miracles.
The movement says that war is the mother of poverty. Working for the poor gradually developed into working for peace: protecting, rebuilding and helping to work toward dialogue. The members have been facilitators in working for peace in the world. Where this is impossible, they help to bring humanitarian aid where most needed. The news services have mentioned that Sant'Egidio members have brought aid to the hungry of North Korea at the request of their diplomats in Rome.
Ecumenism is another area in which they have taken great interest, wanting to facilitate dialogue, as well as striving to understand each other better in order to bring about a more peaceful world. It is with this dream that the Sant'Egidio members continue to work in many of the most difficult areas of the world.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)