Having a close relationship with
another person doesn't mean we know that person. On the page of the
Catholic Times devoted to spirituality, the columnist wants us to
consider a flaw in the thinking of many of us: because we are close to
someone we also tend to think we know the person. What do we really
know, he asks, about the persons we know best?
The
columnist tells us about a trip he made to his hometown with a number
of priest friends. It was a remote fishing village and one of the
villagers, who was closer to the columnist than to his own brother, came
with a car to escort them to the village. On arriving at his house they
quickly unpacked, put on comfortable clothes, and went out to some
rocks overlooking the ocean. The scene was beautiful, and they became
engrossed in pleasant chatting. Pyong Cheol, who had escorted them to
the village and brought them to this spot on the ocean, suddenly said it
was in this place that he caught over ten octopuses.
The
columnist, thinking that Pyong Cheol was showing off in front his
friends, said, "That's a whopper of a tale! You never know what's
possible, even when surrounded by mountains. Are
you saying you know these waters like the women divers of Jejudo?"
Pyong
Cheol, greatly surprised, said, "Is that the kind of person you take me to be? If I go into the
water and come back with two octopuses, what will you say?"
"If you can do that during my stay here, I will do anything you want, and if you don't catch any, you buy us our meal tonight."
Since
the columnist already had decided to buy Pyong Cheol the meal that
evening, for his kindness in picking them up, he couldn't lose the bet,
whatever the outcome. The priests on hearing the terms of the bet
responded with laughter and applause.
Pyong
Cheol took off his upper garments, moved his body with a few light
movements and splashed his way into the calm waters of the ocean, which
at that point were not deep. The group sat looking at what would
transpire, chatting about what would be eaten that evening, and enjoying the ocean breeze and the sun.
Shortly,
Pyong Cheol, off at a distance, came
walking toward them, holding two octopuses, one in each hand. Catching
octopuses with your bare hands is no easy task, but two of them! They
all marveled at the feat. Pyong Cheol lived in an mountainous area quite a distance
from the
ocean, raising pigs. Who would have thought he would know how to catch
octopus, the columnist wondered, which brought to mind the thought that
one never can know another no matter how close we may be to that
person.
The
priests gave Pyong Cheol a round of applause, and one of them went to a
nearby store to buy some hot pepper sauce and vinegar, prior to enjoying the meal and ribbing the columnist on his bet
with Pyong Cheol, who said he would telephone him the next day on what
he wanted done.
The next day his friend's wife sent him a text message telling him that her husband was thinking
of having him clean the pig pens, but thought it would not be proper to
have a priest do such work. The wife then said, laughing, that her husband had excused him from the
bet.
The
columnist said he had learned a good lesson, and that he would be slow
in the future to jump to conclusions, thinking that because he knows a
person, he would know what that person would do.
Saturday, July 20, 2013
Friday, July 19, 2013
The Wisdom of Preparing for Confrontation?
The construction of the navel base in Jejudo is moving ahead, and the bishop of Jejudo, who is also the president of
the Bishops Conference, expressed his thoughts on the matter, among others, when interviewed by the magazine With Bible. There has been opposition to the navel base from the beginning, and the Church
has taken an active part in siding with the opposition, which would
include the majority of the inhabitants on the island. Two government administrations and the
present one have considered the navel
base necessary for security, and also considered necessary because of
the United
States' military strategy in North East Asia. Though there have been
many attempts to block construction of the navel base, after the last
presidential election the work at the base continues as strongly as
ever, around the clock. Since the government is
adamant, using the power of government to back the construction, there
is little that can be done. However, the bishop says they will continue
to oppose the construction.
The bishop was asked by the interviewer: Since there are Catholics on both sides of the issue and you are the pastoral head of the diocese, what kind of attitude is necessary?
The bishop answered that from the beginning he was not giving his personal opinion on the issue. He was expressing the teachings of the Church, council texts, encyclicals and the teachings of the pope. Those who are following Jesus have the mission and the duty, he said, to work for peace.This teaching in Korea has been put on hold and has been given little thought because of the confrontation with North Korea, which has made security the number one priority.
Pope John 23 addressed this issue in Pacem in Terris, "There is a common belief that under modern conditions peace cannot be assured except on the basis of an equal balance of armaments and that this factor is the probable cause of this stockpiling of armaments. Thus, if one country increases its military strength, others are immediately roused by a competitive spirit to augment their own supply of armaments. And if one country is equipped with atomic weapons, others consider themselves justified in producing such weapons themselves, equal in destructive force....Hence justice, right reason, and the recognition of man's dignity cry out insistently for a cessation to the arms race. The stock-piles of armaments which have been built up in various countries must be reduced all round and simultaneously by the parties concerned." It has been over 50 years since these words were written but the Korean Church has been quiet on the issue, which is a dereliction of duty, the bishop said.
To the question: Why do the priests get involved in social problems? The bishop answered that before they are social problems they are human problems. When a person's human rights are taken away and we do nothing, that is not the attitude of a disciple of Jesus. When a person made in the image of God is being hurt and the priest doesn't do anything, he is not doing his duty.This is why popes speak about social issues and why priests act accordingly. There are a few priests who are strongly politically motivated, and cause trouble, but those that bring this issue up do not understand Catholicism.
At the conclusion of the interview, the bishop said he hopes that Jejudo will be a place where we will be able to see peace in the way Pope John 23 described in his encyclical. The bishop wants us to see beyond the confrontation with the North. They are not only the same race but the same children of God. Even though it's difficult to understand the reckless provocative behavior of the North, he reminds us that they are left with little besides their pride, and if we can look upon them with magnanimity, he believes it may be possible to settle the confrontation. He hopes that all parties to the conflict will soon take the steps necessary to bring about a speedy and peaceful resolution.
The bishop was asked by the interviewer: Since there are Catholics on both sides of the issue and you are the pastoral head of the diocese, what kind of attitude is necessary?
The bishop answered that from the beginning he was not giving his personal opinion on the issue. He was expressing the teachings of the Church, council texts, encyclicals and the teachings of the pope. Those who are following Jesus have the mission and the duty, he said, to work for peace.This teaching in Korea has been put on hold and has been given little thought because of the confrontation with North Korea, which has made security the number one priority.
Pope John 23 addressed this issue in Pacem in Terris, "There is a common belief that under modern conditions peace cannot be assured except on the basis of an equal balance of armaments and that this factor is the probable cause of this stockpiling of armaments. Thus, if one country increases its military strength, others are immediately roused by a competitive spirit to augment their own supply of armaments. And if one country is equipped with atomic weapons, others consider themselves justified in producing such weapons themselves, equal in destructive force....Hence justice, right reason, and the recognition of man's dignity cry out insistently for a cessation to the arms race. The stock-piles of armaments which have been built up in various countries must be reduced all round and simultaneously by the parties concerned." It has been over 50 years since these words were written but the Korean Church has been quiet on the issue, which is a dereliction of duty, the bishop said.
To the question: Why do the priests get involved in social problems? The bishop answered that before they are social problems they are human problems. When a person's human rights are taken away and we do nothing, that is not the attitude of a disciple of Jesus. When a person made in the image of God is being hurt and the priest doesn't do anything, he is not doing his duty.This is why popes speak about social issues and why priests act accordingly. There are a few priests who are strongly politically motivated, and cause trouble, but those that bring this issue up do not understand Catholicism.
At the conclusion of the interview, the bishop said he hopes that Jejudo will be a place where we will be able to see peace in the way Pope John 23 described in his encyclical. The bishop wants us to see beyond the confrontation with the North. They are not only the same race but the same children of God. Even though it's difficult to understand the reckless provocative behavior of the North, he reminds us that they are left with little besides their pride, and if we can look upon them with magnanimity, he believes it may be possible to settle the confrontation. He hopes that all parties to the conflict will soon take the steps necessary to bring about a speedy and peaceful resolution.
Thursday, July 18, 2013
The Art of Simplicity
A priest of the Seoul diocese, in a pastoral bulletin, mentions two books that argue forcefully that the current understanding of many that money makes for happiness is all wrong. Simplicity is the key to happiness, according to The Art of Simplicity by Dominique Loreau and How Much Is Enough? by Robert Skidelsky and his son.
The books give us much more than a theoretical understanding of simplicity. Dominique Loreau, who lived the simple life, reflected on its meaning and it was her personal experience which gives strength and ongoing value to her words. The words: "Blessed are the poor," used by our Lord, seem to have a special meaning in today's world for some of our contemporaries.
Dominique Loreau, born in France, is an essayist who graduated from the Sorbonne in English Studies and has taught in England, the United States, Japan and in other parts of the world. She learned that the simpler she lived the more abundance she had. The memos she kept during those years became part of her book, which has sold over a million copies.
When we try to satisfy our greed, we lose the meaning of life.The priest gives us the table of contents, with comments.
Articles: When we have more than what we need we are carrying a burden. Having too much we become attached and do not advance.Isn't life a preparation to move us ahead?
House: Is not a place we store our unmovable objects, but a place to be refreshed.To be inspired and healed. A place where we return for the essentials.
Time: Is something we can truly make our own. We need not fear the future but only that we may lose the present.
Body: To eat little and keep our bodies agile is wisdom in action. To take care of the health of the body is equivalent to the value of a work of art.
Our consumer society is bidding us to have more, but the more we have the more twisted our life becomes; it is the paradox we have to face. The reason we are not happy is that we have too much. Let us, he says, put in order our possessions, our bodies and spirit. A simple life is able enjoy everything, being content to know the joy of the ordinary and the insignificant.
The book, How much is enough? confronts us with the fact that we are much better off materially than in the past but asks, Why is it that we are not happier? The book is a counter argument to our craving for more.
According to Keynes the demonic properties of greed and competition have to be restricted. The followers of neo-liberablism, however, have considered these the keys for a vibrant economy. For a good life, he concludes, we have to reduce the stress of work and to search for ways in which incomes will provide for a decent living for all.
Wednesday, July 17, 2013
Words to Ponder
Words of wisdom appearing on the front page of a bulletin for priests:
Prayer is not like a spare tire we use when we have a problem,
but the steering wheel that steers us to where we should be going.
What is the reason the front window of a car is large but the rear-view mirror is small?
The past is not as important as the future, so we look ahead and move forward.
How is friendship like a book?
We can destroy it by fire in a few minutes, but it takes years to write.
All earthly things come to an end. When circumstances are favorable enjoy them, they will not always be so.
When circumstances are not favorable, don't worry they will not always be so.
An old friend is like gold, a new friend like a diamond. When the diamond appears don't forget the gold.
The diamond always needs a pedestal.
We often lose hope and think it's the end, but God speaks to us from above:
"Be at peace, it is only a bend and not the end."
Have trust in God's power when your problems have been solved.
When they are not, God trusts in your capabilities.
A blind person asked St. Anthony: "Is there anything worse than being blind?"
"Losing your vision," he answered.
When we pray for others, God listens to our prayer and gives blessings. Often when we are at peace, free of mishaps and happy, let us think of those praying for us.
Tuesday, July 16, 2013
Resentment: Serious Problem
There
is a word in Korean often used when we direct our anger to another
person or object without any reason: kicking a stone or some other
'innocent' object would be a familiar example. Recently, there have been
reports of crimes causing harm to persons without any apparent motive
on the part of the criminal. They appear to be random acts of anger
perpetrated on someone for no reason, which has led many to fear simply
walking the streets or being out at any time of the day or night. A
priest, in a bulletin for priests, reflects on how this illusive but
increasingly pervasive feeling is invading our lives, and a bit more
often, he says, than we would like to believe.
A person at work, he relates, was scolded for doing something he shouldn't have done. It was a minor matter, but he was roundly reprimanded. Feeling gloomy and depressed, he left to take the bus to go home. It was raining and by the time the bus came he was soaking wet. On the bus, someone stepped on his foot, and when he arrived home, he found his two children fighting with each other, and looking around at their room all he could see was a mess. He blew up at them and, crying, they went to their room. In the kitchen his wife was preparing the dinner and, still filled with anger, he spoke angrily with his wife. Needless to say there was no peace in that family that night.
He went to his room and reflected on the events of the day. He saw that his resentment toward his boss had carried over to his family, destroying the harmony that was present before he arrived; even the fighting of his children was a normal occurrence that would not have bothered him at other times. He quickly vowed to do something to fix the situation, and before long he was able to see himself honestly, which was God's grace working within him, as we Christians would like to express it.
Many of us have hurt others, but thankfully have realized it and made up for our insensitivity and the hurt we have given. Understanding what we have done is not difficult, but overcoming our self-centeredness and making amends is not so easy, and often requires an extraordinary act of grace, said the priest.
Everyone has the choice of following either our egotistical instincts or the voice of God, the choice often resulting in conflicting emotions. Our natural instincts may tend to move us in one direction and the voice of God in another. At times, what we call the voice of conscience leading us to do the good is not readily apparent. Its influence on us, he says, will often depend on the disposition we have nurtured over the years.
Blocking out the voice of conscience, if we listen carefully, he says, will be the voice of our selfishness. Those who treasure material things and guide their lives without concern for others are going to have difficulty hearing the voice of conscience, and even if it is heard, he says, it will have little influence on their actions.
He concludes the article by saying that the tendency to be concerned about ones self is not bad; it is necessary for survival and for progress. But when that is the only voice one hears then we are likely to have a serious problem, which often results in a life that is being interrupted continually by lack of peace and joy.
A person at work, he relates, was scolded for doing something he shouldn't have done. It was a minor matter, but he was roundly reprimanded. Feeling gloomy and depressed, he left to take the bus to go home. It was raining and by the time the bus came he was soaking wet. On the bus, someone stepped on his foot, and when he arrived home, he found his two children fighting with each other, and looking around at their room all he could see was a mess. He blew up at them and, crying, they went to their room. In the kitchen his wife was preparing the dinner and, still filled with anger, he spoke angrily with his wife. Needless to say there was no peace in that family that night.
He went to his room and reflected on the events of the day. He saw that his resentment toward his boss had carried over to his family, destroying the harmony that was present before he arrived; even the fighting of his children was a normal occurrence that would not have bothered him at other times. He quickly vowed to do something to fix the situation, and before long he was able to see himself honestly, which was God's grace working within him, as we Christians would like to express it.
Many of us have hurt others, but thankfully have realized it and made up for our insensitivity and the hurt we have given. Understanding what we have done is not difficult, but overcoming our self-centeredness and making amends is not so easy, and often requires an extraordinary act of grace, said the priest.
Everyone has the choice of following either our egotistical instincts or the voice of God, the choice often resulting in conflicting emotions. Our natural instincts may tend to move us in one direction and the voice of God in another. At times, what we call the voice of conscience leading us to do the good is not readily apparent. Its influence on us, he says, will often depend on the disposition we have nurtured over the years.
Blocking out the voice of conscience, if we listen carefully, he says, will be the voice of our selfishness. Those who treasure material things and guide their lives without concern for others are going to have difficulty hearing the voice of conscience, and even if it is heard, he says, it will have little influence on their actions.
He concludes the article by saying that the tendency to be concerned about ones self is not bad; it is necessary for survival and for progress. But when that is the only voice one hears then we are likely to have a serious problem, which often results in a life that is being interrupted continually by lack of peace and joy.
Monday, July 15, 2013
I am the Happiest Person in the World
In a diocesan bulletin, a priest
writes that he made a trip to Panama, Central America, early this year
because he read it was the happiest country in the world. After the
visit, he said he could now be considered one of the happiest persons in the world, after meeting the "happiest people in the world."
The index used for determining happiness in this case he learned has nothing to do with possessions or finances. This realization brought to mind a poem by Sister Hae-in Lee- A Happy Face. (She has been struggling with cancer for many years.)
"Because I say I am having difficulty doesn't mean I am not happy. And because I say I am happy doesn't mean that I am not in pain, for sure. When I open wide my heart happiness comes with a thousand faces--no, it comes with numberless faces, and I'm able to experience the joy of happiness. Where it hides I don't know, but with beautiful wings, furtively, the happiness appears. I am playing hide and seek with it as it pulls at my heart strings, and today I am again happy." Poor as the translation must be, the meaning is clear: no matter the circumstances, happiness can be found.
The key to happiness, the poet is saying, is to open wide the door to our hearts. When that is done the eyes naturally open and our thinking changes, and we can see the world and ourselves differently. I can then cry out truly, the priest writes, "I am the happiest priest in the world!" Just as we all can cry out, he says, "I am the happiest person in the world!"
However, there are many people who have closed the doors to their hearts. Our 'apartment culture', which tends to move us toward individualism and egotism, is influencing us, beginning, he says, by living with the doors to our homes being locked. When our doors are locked, our hearts also tend to get locked, he says. This is one of the reasons that many do not want people to come to their homes, and a reason there is so much difficulty in building small Christian communities. Helping to break this down is one reason we use parishioner's homes to hold small community meetings. When we refuse to have others come to our house, we are refusing Jesus, he says.
Christianity is a religion of revelation. In Korean, 'revelation' means open and seen. God so loved us that he opened himself to us; he gave us all of himself. This is what he wants from us. Our life, likewise, following God's example, should be open. We don't want to refuse him entrance and have him "go to the stable."
If we open the doors to our homes we will be opening our hearts and opening ourselves to happiness. We will begin to live, the Church will begin to live, and the world will live. Happiness will be the natural result, and all of us will be able to cry out, 'I am the happiest person in the world'.
The index used for determining happiness in this case he learned has nothing to do with possessions or finances. This realization brought to mind a poem by Sister Hae-in Lee- A Happy Face. (She has been struggling with cancer for many years.)
"Because I say I am having difficulty doesn't mean I am not happy. And because I say I am happy doesn't mean that I am not in pain, for sure. When I open wide my heart happiness comes with a thousand faces--no, it comes with numberless faces, and I'm able to experience the joy of happiness. Where it hides I don't know, but with beautiful wings, furtively, the happiness appears. I am playing hide and seek with it as it pulls at my heart strings, and today I am again happy." Poor as the translation must be, the meaning is clear: no matter the circumstances, happiness can be found.
The key to happiness, the poet is saying, is to open wide the door to our hearts. When that is done the eyes naturally open and our thinking changes, and we can see the world and ourselves differently. I can then cry out truly, the priest writes, "I am the happiest priest in the world!" Just as we all can cry out, he says, "I am the happiest person in the world!"
However, there are many people who have closed the doors to their hearts. Our 'apartment culture', which tends to move us toward individualism and egotism, is influencing us, beginning, he says, by living with the doors to our homes being locked. When our doors are locked, our hearts also tend to get locked, he says. This is one of the reasons that many do not want people to come to their homes, and a reason there is so much difficulty in building small Christian communities. Helping to break this down is one reason we use parishioner's homes to hold small community meetings. When we refuse to have others come to our house, we are refusing Jesus, he says.
Christianity is a religion of revelation. In Korean, 'revelation' means open and seen. God so loved us that he opened himself to us; he gave us all of himself. This is what he wants from us. Our life, likewise, following God's example, should be open. We don't want to refuse him entrance and have him "go to the stable."
If we open the doors to our homes we will be opening our hearts and opening ourselves to happiness. We will begin to live, the Church will begin to live, and the world will live. Happiness will be the natural result, and all of us will be able to cry out, 'I am the happiest person in the world'.
Sunday, July 14, 2013
Punishment And Rehabilitation
A priest who heads a
rehabilitation home for the young discusses, in the diocesan bulletin, a
serious problem which was highlighted recently when a video, widely
circulated on the internet, showed high-school students, on a visit to a
home for the aged, treating them abusively. The images went viral,
generating a lot of comment, mostly critical of the students, and often
quite angry. Their high-school also became the focus of a great deal of
the criticism, and the school responded with a letter of apology, and
expelled the students.
In the article the priest expresses three reasons why he was astonished by the incident. First of all, by the thoughtless actions of the students, by the immediate comments made following the viewing of the video, and by the subsequent response of the school.
There is no question, of course, that what the students did was wrong; they should have been rebuked and punished. However, there was no reference to the responsibility of the society that had created the conditions contributing to the incident. There was no concern, the priest said, for the problems the children had in growing up, the difficulties they had in the home and school, and no criticism for the supervisors who were supposed to look after the students. The comments, he said, were only attacks on the students.
Though the school did send out an apology and the students were expelled, there was no attempt made to help them rejoin the human family. The priest couldn't rid himself of the idea that the school was only interested in protecting its image by punishing the students. Disciplining the students was the proper action, he said, but by neglecting to help them correct their behavior, the punishment could only be seen as punishment for the sake of punishment.
He refers to the time when Jesus said to those who dragged the woman caught in adultery before him, "Let the man among you who has no sin be the first to cast a stone at her" (John 8:7). Jesus brought her to where she had sorrow for what was done, the priest explained. Though this incident appears to be quite different, the love and concern Jesus displayed for the woman was what the priest felt should have guided the response of everyone, when the abusive conduct of the students became known.
Recently, there has been a great deal of concern for the problems of the young, with many TV programs talking about the crisis. The priest hopes that we will be able to learn how to move forward from this crisis of the young, resolving many of its most pressing issues by having the kind of heart Jesus has revealed to us.
In the article the priest expresses three reasons why he was astonished by the incident. First of all, by the thoughtless actions of the students, by the immediate comments made following the viewing of the video, and by the subsequent response of the school.
There is no question, of course, that what the students did was wrong; they should have been rebuked and punished. However, there was no reference to the responsibility of the society that had created the conditions contributing to the incident. There was no concern, the priest said, for the problems the children had in growing up, the difficulties they had in the home and school, and no criticism for the supervisors who were supposed to look after the students. The comments, he said, were only attacks on the students.
Though the school did send out an apology and the students were expelled, there was no attempt made to help them rejoin the human family. The priest couldn't rid himself of the idea that the school was only interested in protecting its image by punishing the students. Disciplining the students was the proper action, he said, but by neglecting to help them correct their behavior, the punishment could only be seen as punishment for the sake of punishment.
He refers to the time when Jesus said to those who dragged the woman caught in adultery before him, "Let the man among you who has no sin be the first to cast a stone at her" (John 8:7). Jesus brought her to where she had sorrow for what was done, the priest explained. Though this incident appears to be quite different, the love and concern Jesus displayed for the woman was what the priest felt should have guided the response of everyone, when the abusive conduct of the students became known.
Recently, there has been a great deal of concern for the problems of the young, with many TV programs talking about the crisis. The priest hopes that we will be able to learn how to move forward from this crisis of the young, resolving many of its most pressing issues by having the kind of heart Jesus has revealed to us.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)