Deciding
on what course of action to take when contemplating the work we intend
to pursue after college, students frequently are confronted with a
choice: select the work that will bring in the most money or select what
the heart wants and will bring them the most personal satisfaction. In
the Peace Weekly, a college professor mentions meeting a student on
campus, who openly confided her worries to the professor. With a double
major in business administration, she looked forward to the future but
did not feel she would be happy in that field. At this stage in the
educational process, she told the professor she felt she lacked the
courage to change. Should she continue in business for a successful
career, she asked, or should she do what her heart wants? That was her
plight.
To
be successful, you must have the grades and specifications that are
better than others, consequently, you sacrifice sports and time
socializing with the opposite sex, to have more time for classroom work
and the library. Even with this routine there often is not enough time
for study. It has been some time now that colleges have lost their image
of being temples for learning and have become training schools for
jobs. The romanticism of the campuses has disappeared. Everyone,
seemingly, is madly searching for a successful career. The professor
wonders who is responsible for this headlong desire for success in the
marketplace. Is it, he asks, the way to happiness?
Interestingly,
the word for "successful career" is made up of two Chinese characters
(出世), meaning "leave" and "world." Originally, the word in Buddhism
meant "to leave the world," riches and honors were not considered of
much value. The word also has another meaning of "gaining fame in the
world." The first character keeps its meaning but the character for
world depends on the meaning given. Those who have a negative meaning
for the word would be Buddha, Chuang Tzu and Plato. Buddha found the
world full of hardships; the quicker we rid our self of this pain the
better. Life for Chuang Tzu was like an excrescence on the body, a boil
we have to excise; for Plato the body was a prison that needed to be
left behind. For all three, the world was a fetter from which we want to
free ourselves.
The
second meaning--making a name for oneself in the world--would depend
on the value one seeks. Today, making a name for oneself is the more
often understood meaning of the word, in most instances. A third meaning
for the word would be to seek another world much better than the one we
are currently living in.
It
seems, says the professor, that the early Greeks also saw making a name
for oneself in the world as the ideal goal in life. Seeing life as a
place to gain possessions would help to influence this kind of thinking.
This was one of the reasons, the professor notes, that oratory was so
highly valued with the Greek sophists, who were not interested in truth
or falsehood, but in what would benefit oneself. Confucius considered
this thinking self-flattery.
But
no matter how you understand the word, "world," it's the place we live
in, we can't, the professor reminds us, completely separate our self
from this world. We can only move from one place to another within it,
giving up one thing for another. One man who was volunteering in a free
lunch program for the elderly said something which moved the professor
deeply, " I am a person who has been fed and now I'm feeding others; I
have succeeded in life." In the same way, says the professor, a person
who has overcome the world has succeeded. When a person's thinking
changes, when we can relinquish the things of the world which imprison
us, and we can freely choose among many possibilities, then our
opportunities to find happiness will also increase.