Blunt Talk and Gossip

 

October 9th is the 576th Hangul Day. [The holiday marks the invention and proclamation of the Korean alphabet in 1446] The  Peace Column of the Catholic Peace Weekly gives the readers some thoughts on the words we use.

 

It is a legal holiday established to promote the originality and scientific nature of Hangul and to raise awareness of the love of Hangul. It will be celebrated on the 10th of October this year. However, this year's Hangul Day seems somewhat gloomy.

 

The whole country is noisy with the president using profane language, close to abusive language on the international diplomatic stage. After attending a fund-raising event by the US President Biden at the United Nations, the rude remarks he made as he left the event became a problem. Politicians and the media were prepared with all kinds of interpretations, arguments, and excuses for the Korean language that appeared in the remarks. However, it is accepted as the truth that the president's remarks were vulgar language and were spoken to our officials (off the record caught by the mike after the event).

 

Politicians' gossip is not a thing of the past. Even in face-to-face conversations, some use provocative language, ridicule and slander of others. They do not choose what to say or not to say, it just comes out. But even worse than gossip are words that do harm. Gossip that is negative is more common than praise. It's a hidden insult to one's personality. It is cowardly and petty and undermines the harmony and peace of the community. 

 

According to psychology, gossip is an expression of inferiority, dissatisfaction with reality, and loneliness. It is a sad struggle to hide frustration and humiliation, and the last resistance of a wounded soul. There are very few people who have never gossiped. So, the president's gossip and words are humanly understandable. However, the president's words, which are exposed to the whole world, must be honest and clear, and his actions must be under his control.

 

Pope Francis said, "If you don't gossip you are on the way to  becoming a saint." Gossip no matter the logic used if you don't sincerely love the other person the words will express anger. Gossip is possible only if there is someone who accepts the conversation. Therefore, you become a sympathizer even if you do not engage in gossip but remain there. Gossip spreads quickly like poisonous mushrooms through various media such as SNS, creating more gossip. The victim of gossip can be not only the other party but also the community itself.

 

Distrust in politics is because politicians engage in antagonism and confrontation with each other through reckless blunt talk and gossip. The essence of politics is to reduce differences through concessions and compromises on issues that can only cause ruptures due to differences of opinion. And the difference has to be resolved through heart to heart dialogue without the

rude, rough talk.

 

If a president is not careful with their words, not only the dignity of politics but also the dignity of the nation deteriorates. Confucius' disciple,said to Confucius: "If you were in charge of the government what would you do first?"  Confucius replied: 必也 正名乎 the proper naming of things (rectification of names). Confucius believed  the failure to understand and conduct oneself properly at least partially,was the failure to name things properly.

 

It means that if the cause is not right, the words will not be right, and if the words are not right, the work will not be done correctly.

 

Korean Hangul has been a language of communication and harmony since birth. King Sejong created 28 letters so that the people could easily learn and convey each other's meaning. It was not a language for antagonism, envy, and discrimination.

 

Just like the proverb that a single word conveyed well  pays off a a debt of thousand 'nyang'. The power of a single word is immeasurably great and overflowing. The words and language of the leaders are not always the  voices of the people nor voices from heaven. On Hangul Day, what words and language will the president use in his commemorative speech to understand the hearts of the people who are disappointed and hurt?

Integral Human Development

On the Catholic website Here/Now an article from the Jesuit Human Rights Solidarity Research Center was reproduced for the readers on a series on Integral Human Development; this is a summary of some of the ideas.

'Integral human development is social teaching of the Catholic Church that explores the conditions and prospects for development that will enable all human beings to 'live more humanely'. 

Humans are complex and diverse. Whole human development seeks to use this complexity as a measure of 'human dignity' preparing for material and spiritual life that will enable growth into full, lively human beings. 

 

'Living better' is clearly different from 'having more'. This includes the ability to participate freely in growth, sustainability of the ecological environment, promotion of human rights and justice, values ​​of spirituality, and responsible actions, including honesty. 

 

Integral human development is a universal way of thinking, understanding, and interacting with others and ourselves, and in particular a thoughtful and enduring response to the world's poverty, disease, ignorance, discrimination, exclusion, and oppression.  

 

In 2016, Pope Francis established the Ministry for the Promotion of Integral Human Development, which carries out health and relief activities that require global cooperation, including justice, peace, creation, and preservation, and is focusing more on realizing this task. 

 

A trait of an individual that is buried or unrecognized is a loss to those who possess it, but it is also a loss to all of us. So, everyone should take a closer look at each and every person around them. Integrity of human development is an attempt to clearly reveal and reveal the elements necessary for us to live a full and lively life.  

 

Contrary to popular belief, talents and abilities are a common fruit. Therefore, it is the essence of the human community to care for, support, and help others in their growth.  

 

Louis-Joseph Lebre, who first proposed the concept of integrated human development, said that 'dignity needs' are essential for everyone to make this possible. 'Needs' are basic conditions we must have to live, such as food, work, and housing. If these conditions are not met, people will suffer excruciatingly from poverty and inequality.

 

Louis-Joseph Lebre (1897-1966) was a French Dominican priest; economist and social activist whose life has been a life of research and struggle for justice. He laid the theoretical foundations for 'integral human development', an important part of Catholic social teaching. He started the labor movement in Saint-Malo, France, in the 1930s with fishing workers suffering from the economic crisis, and in Latin America, he was involved in research and popular movements. 

 

With his experience and research at this time, he proposed a new type of development model, the 'human economy. An "economy that serves people" is "an economy in which as many people as possible can live to the fullest". He is the principal author of Paul VI's Encyclical 'The Development of Peoples' (1967) and was also a major influence on John Paul II's Encyclical 'Social Concern' (1987) and Benedict XVI's Encyclical 'Love in the Truth' (2007).

 

Lebré added life with dignity to this which includes, for example, 'space'. You need space to rest, socialize with colleagues, and close the door at other times to think and pray. To create yourself and live a healthy life with self-esteem, you must have space. 

 

This space is a material form, but its role is more than an object. Space in this sense is not desirable, but essential. So it is not a 'desire for dignity' but a 'need' for dignity. The dignity-oriented perspective teaches that not only basic needs such as housing and food, but also the inner life and inner realm of a person are essential to human growth. This inner realm is traditionally called the soul, but the content refers to the inner power that animates and shapes human beings. 

 

The Catechism of the Catholic Church calls the soul "the most intimate and valuable spiritual source" of man and the image of man created by God himself. When understood from the soul's point of view, we see that human dignity is an indicator of the depth and mystery of humanity. Human dignity means that it firmly affirms the uniqueness of human beings and human existence, and extends the horizon of humanity beyond the limits of time and body. 

 

Lebré opened a path that not only satisfies basic needs but also awakens human needs from within, leading to integrated growth and development. To live a life full of dignity, we must live from within. Restoring a broken society requires internal renewal, and resisting temptations. Human growth must be holistic and integrated. 

 

The pandemic era we passed through has been harsh and cruel for most of the people except the rich few. The failure of global leadership, especially with privilege and power, makes it clear what kind of people we shouldn't be. Those who showed healing leadership were health care workers, caregivers, cleaning and delivery workers. People who have neither ability nor responsibility should no longer be allowed to lead the community. Showtime is over and we can no longer go back to the pre-pandemic. Before us, are questions about how do we adapt and find happiness in a new age of no return.

Politics destroying our Diplomacy

 

Big and small dramas that occurred during President Yun Seok-yeol's tour of the UK, US, and Canada last month have provoked a political clash between the ruling and opposition parties. The Democratic Party, arguing that the president's tour ended in a diplomatic disaster, passed a proposal to dismiss the Foreign Affairs minister holding him accountable.
 
On the other hand, the ruling camp, including the presidential office, accused the media of damaging the national interest by distorting the president's private remarks, and accused MBC, where the first report was published, of defamation. This seems to be based on the perception that the Democratic Party should not be pushed because the Democratic Party is carrying out a political offensive with the cooperation of the media.
 
There is a saying that 'Politics ends at the water's edge. [Politicians should always present a united front to other countries] In 1947, Arthur Vandenberg, chairman of the U.S. Senate Foreign Relations Committee, emphasized the importance of a bipartisan approach to diplomacy. This means that the political conflict should end at home. A leading Republican politician, he was an isolationist in foreign policy, but actively supported internationalist diplomacy, working closely with the Democrat Truman administration at a time when the United States sought an international role in the post-World War II counter-communist threat. Based on the bipartisan cooperation in Congress, the United States was able to pursue important policies such as the creation of NATO, and furthermore, it was able to establish a liberal international order. 

Of course, as political polarization deepens in the United States, a bipartisan approach to diplomacy is increasingly difficult to find, and blind factionalism in politics continues to intensifying instead. The United States may be able to take comfort in saying that it is not our only problem, but it is hard to forget that we are in a much more difficult environment than the United States in diplomacy.
 
As North Korea seeks to upgrade its nuclear armament, inter-Korean dialogue is completely cut off, and the Korean Peninsula is moving away from the primary interest of the United States due to the Ukraine war. As the US-China competition intensifies, our diplomatic position is narrowing, and even the possibility of a military conflict over the Taiwan Strait is being discussed.
 
In addition, there are economic difficulties such as the super-strengthening of the dollar, called the “king dollar,” increasing inflationary pressure, weakening of the free trade order, and supply chain reorganization. In addition, new agendas following climate change, health and quarantine, and the 4th industrial revolution are expected to influence the future competitiveness of the country, so an urgent diplomatic response is required.
 
Diplomacy that focuses on political relations with major powers, is not enough. Even a small country that is geographically far away from us has rare minerals and resources, and if there is even a small market, we should actively strengthen our relationship. Public diplomacy, science and technology diplomacy not only with the governments of  other countries but also with private companies and organizations are important. All-out diplomacy is necessary in all directions and on all levels, but the politicization of diplomacy only hinders this. Excessive focus on short-term performance and peripheral emotion-provoking issues, while neglecting the essential task of diplomacy.
 
The people's minds are very uncomfortable looking at the recent situation in which a sharp political battle is taking place over the subject of the President's tour diplomacy. The approval rating for President Yoon Seok-yeol, who had shown a slight upward trend, fell back to the 20% level right after the tour. That's not to say the Democrats' approval rating has risen. In the presidential election in March, voters' choices were made based on 'who do you hate less', and our politics has not been able to escape from that trend. Isn't it time to break free from the practice of bringing everything into politics, including diplomacy? The international situation we are currently facing is not one in which Korea has the leisure to ignore.

Recording for the Future

A priest in the eyes of the clergy column of the Catholic Peace Weekly introduces us to an important issue in today's world— Recording.

Records are powerful. There are times when shame comes to him just by looking at the diary he wrote when young. This may be because it confirms his immature, innocent memories. These days, SNS is used to replace a diary, For him, it is like Pandora's box which has been stored in digital format containing the stormy period of his life.

It is not just individuals who know the power of records. Without citing the example of the Presidential Archives, which often suffer attempts to change our memories by twisting yesterday's records because all know the power of records.

In a court of law, the most important factor in determining the substance of a case is visible evidence rather than memory-based testimony. If you know the smartphone password and check what is recorded you know the whereabouts of a person. Otherwise, it is difficult to reach the substantive truth of a crime.

Sometimes, human beings who have endured the storms of history are also a record. The Japanese comfort women survivors are the history books that record the horrors of war. The disappearance of separated families is a record that shows why the two Koreas need to dialogue right now. Those who survived the 1980s in Gwangju are records of democracy.

Records are also letters to the future: history textbook problems and pro-Japanese problems of the past, these records of the past bring despair to some living today and courage to others. Germany still strives to properly document the war crimes committed in World War II.

So, if only it can be undocumented, crime is encouraged. The forefront of undocumented crime these days is the Internet space. They do not reveal themselves as criminals with their names but hide behind false IDs. You can send and receive videos of sexual exploitation just by uploading and downloading without knowing each other.

Conversely, if criminals can manipulate records at will, records can become weapons. Digital sex offenders threaten victims with records. The perpetrator secretly filmed (recorded) the video of sexual intercourse with the victim and threaten the victim to upload (record) the video on the Internet. It is no coincidence that all kinds of insidious crimes, including digital sex crimes, revolve around Telegram, which records are difficult to access.

Moreover, as seen in the village where former President Moon Jae-in's private residence is located, when the writer sees those who record baseless slander and abusive language and claim that this is the truth, he seriously contemplates the harm of what is recorded.

It is said that this is the heyday of single-person media but feels the need for a media that is unwavering, truthful, and faithful is ever more necessary. Because we know the power of what is recorded by the media, the need for reflection and concern in its daily work.

So, let's reflect on the mission of the press, the recorder of history, including the Catholic Peace Broadcasting Company. We should record the lives of the poor and the little ones in the low places, not the glamorous stage of the high places. Records should save people and bring peace to the world. We need to record.

Living A Proper Asian Life Style

Many of our problems come from failure to live a proper life style.

One often runs across the Ku Seun-ja prescription for a healthy life on the internet. However, its reliability as historically accurate in understanding of Asian ethical thinking is open to doubt. The story does show that in  certain segments  of Korean life it did ring true  and traditional  Asian and the Christian West  did see the ethical life in similar ways. For those who read Korean—https://83100052.tistory.com/15708582

The famous doctor was once approached by a man in his 40s with all kinds of complaints. The doctor listened  and said with the medicines we have it will be difficult to cure but if you follow this  prescription you will be on a way to a cure.

The doctor's prescription had 30 items.              

1) No bad thoughts                                                               16) Know how to be fulfilled    

2) Do good things                                                                  17) Diligence and integrity

3)  No Deceit                                                                        18) Always Kind

4) Lead others rightly                                                             19) Save in every way you can

5) Live within your means                                                        20) Moderation

6) No jealously or envy                                                            21) Don't kill any life

7)  No trickery                                                                       22)  No anger

8)  Sincerity in all things                                                          23) No violence

9)  Always do the right thing                                                    24)  No Avarice

10)  Know that life is short                                                       25) Act prudently

11) Live with a clean heart                                                       26) Submit to reason

12)  Beware of selfishness                                                        27) Help the weak lovingly

13) Patience                                                                          28) Know when to withdraw

14) Gentleness                                                                       29)  Maintain tranquility

15) Humility                                                                           30) Keep secrets

Looking at the 30 items there is little that the Christian would have difficulty with except for 'not killing any life'. The virtuous life would be  seen  as similar. The above items  would be the Asian idea of the person living according to reason.

The article concludes with the writer mentioning the passage in the Christian Bible in which St. Paul in his letter to the Galatians mentions the 9 fruits of the Spirit: Love, Joy, Peace, Patience, Kindness, Goodness, Trustfulness, Gentleness and Self-control. However his summary of the situation in the world, he wonders if you would  find any Christian, Catholic or Protestant, in their words or actions who would be bearing  these fruits of the Spirit.

                                                                            

                                                                        

The Place of Women In the Church

What does it mean that we are all one in Christ (Galatians 3:28)?

An article in a Bulletin for Catholic priests, a  religious sister has some strong words to deliver to the clergy whose efforts in the pastoral work of the church she is very familiar. She works in a ministry for Hope and Joy.

 

"In what way did the world look down on women to teach them? How did the patriarchal male Catholic Church structure and culture grow in strength? I often meditate on Genesis. Because I often experience that the answers to the world's problems can be found there."

 

God made Eve for Adam as a 'cooperator suitable for him' (Genesis 2:18). When Adam meets Eve, he marvels and welcomes her, saying: "Bone from my bones and flesh from my flesh" (Genesis 2:23). Man and woman were 'collaborators' and 'one' (one body) to take care of the world newly created. 

 

How did a woman like this fall into the position of being included in man's  property list?  In fact, the idea of Eve made of men's ribs was possible due to a male-centered culture that monopolized intellectual information and activities. It would certainly be different if a woman wrote it.

 

The attitude of 'blaming Eve' without any sense of responsibility or loyalty is the epitome of 'irresponsibility' expressed today by the 'absence of  men in today's abortion situation. Adam, who loved Eve, immediately said that 'the woman you gave me' (Genesis 3:12) seduced him and ate what was given. Adam tried to bring about a dissonance between God and Eve. How ungrateful and cowardly.

 

Adam's attitude of blaming Eve without responsibility or loyalty after the original crime, forgetting that he shouted "bone from my bone" —Is that all? Abraham and Isaac, who loved their beautiful wife, also pushed them out as "sisters" at the moment of crisis and created room for sexual favors to those in power. From the perspective of Eve, Sarah, and Rebekah, how did they look upon the masculinity of  their husbands?

 

In a patriarchal society at that time, living as a 'submissive woman' to a man with physical and economic power, wounds and resentment must have accumulated inside them. It is a relationship that requires healing and reconciliation. Evangelical Relations - In order to heal the world, the characteristic of the early Christian Church was its orientation to an egalitarian society free from status and gender discrimination. This has been a healing value in human history. The hope that the community itself would be filled with joy. In other words, it was the Gospel.

 

The Catholic bishops who came to Korea  were more innovative. Of course, there was a background of the times in which it was difficult to receive priests due to a severe persecution, but what made the Catholic community proud was the fact that it was a church led by 'laity (comrades)' who did not differentiate between men and women. This is undoubtedly a message given by God from the point of view of faith. 

 

One of the reasons for the rapid spread of Christianity in Korea was that it has opened up a world of 'liberation' that transcends identity and gender. In the Middle Ages, it became extremely powerful, and in the Middle Ages, it had a hierarchical structure and was strengthened centered on men, and women as subordinate beings.  The church must first respect and trust women. 

 

We need to recover the lay-centered church community by discovering the unique intellectual values ​​and various gifts of women who are doing all kinds of work within the parishes. The perseverance and femininity to heal the earth revealed in the Virgin Mary and the women who were with her and stayed with Jesus until the end of the Passion. It is because women have an easier time of making loving decisions for life and are able to restore the lay-centered church community. We need to revive the values ​​of women in the church!  Men and women together make up the human race. If we revive femininity, destruction and war will be reduced.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Abolition of the Death Penalty

The Catholic Times in the recent issue reports on the Bishop's Conference subcommittee on the abolition of the death penalty with the theme of 'the deterrent effect of the criminal policy of the punishment system'.

With the occurrence of heinous crimes in society, voices continue to arise calling for stronger punishment. However, statistics show that a moderate sentence is ineffective in preventing serious crimes; the deterrent effect of the death penalty, the biggest punishment, is also the same, and even if the effect of preventing crime is proven, experts have debated whether the death penalty is justifiable.
 
This seminar was held to commemorate the 20th anniversary of the World Day for the Abolition of the Death Penalty. A senior research fellow at the Korea Institute for Criminal and Justice Policy, who gave a presentation, discussed the issue of the deterrence of crimes and the abolition of the death penalty.
 
Researcher Kim explained: "If you look at the trend of major crimes over the past 10 years published by the Supreme Prosecutors' Office, both violent crimes and heinous crimes such as homicide, robbery, and rape showed little change." It is said that there was no significant change in violent crimes and the damage that followed.
 
He also made the same statement about the death penalty, the heaviest and most severe punishment. According to the results of a comparative study of changes in the homicide rate in 11 countries that abolished the death penalty in 2018, the homicide rate decreased by an average of 6 over the 10 years since the abolition of the death penalty.
 
He said: "It cannot be interpreted that the abolition of the death penalty has the effect of reducing homicide, but at least the fact that the death penalty does not increase after the abolition of the death penalty is clear, so it can be accepted as evidence that the effect of the death penalty on preventing homicide is difficult to recognize."
 
Furthermore, research has left the question of whether the death penalty is necessary or justifiable even if its effectiveness in preventing crime is proven. "What is clear is that the death penalty is a cruel and unacceptable punishment as part of the normal social system."  He also pointed out that the death penalty in Korean society is contaminated by misjudgments and irreversible sacrifices like the 'Inhyukdang' case.
 
"The essence of the death penalty, which cruelly takes the lives of others, should not be obscured," said a lawyer at the Public Interest and Human Rights Advocacy Center, a group of lawyers for a democratic society who participated in the debate. The death penalty cannot be justified under any circumstances.
 
Bishop Son-tae Kim, in his opening speech before the presentation, emphasized: "It is the state, the government, and the National Assembly that can stop the vicious cycle of repeated violence. If the Republic of Korea becomes a complete abolitionist country by the abolition of the death penalty by our National Assembly, it will play an important role in leading the cessation of executions and the abolition of the death penalty in Asian countries. We hope that we will be reborn as a human rights nation that respects human rights."