A religious 
sister tells us of her childhood visits to a close relative who later 
became an actor. Those visits, she recalls, were fun-filled times.  
 
However,
 years later after he had become a famous actor the connection with 
family and relatives ended. When he married, all the entertainment 
celebrities were there, but the family was not. His family, 
understandably, was upset, but they ceased seeing him as part of the 
family, she said. He was now seen more as 'capital' (a source for 
personal profit).
According
 to the sister, capital should not only be seen as money but as 
contacts, capabilities, qualifications, trust, power, prestige, honor, 
attention and the like. When one of these begins to increase, the others
 also increase. These activities and states of mind are all capital, 
according to the French sociologist Pierre Bourdieu, who considered 
cultural and social activities and values as capital in much the same 
way as we view economic capital. Both influence society and have their 
affect on our tastes and lifestyles.  
The actor, once he became 
successful, began to amass wealth, contacts and honors, which allowed 
him to have some influence in society and to live in an area were the 
elite of society congregate. He was no longer the person, the sister 
said, that lived with his family and related with others. Which prompted
 her to ask herself the questions: Who am I?  What do I consume? Both 
questions, she suggests, have similar answers. Our tastes and our 
ability to discern truth from error, she believes, may often depend on the things we possess and  consume, which then give rise to our values and world view. 
She
 mentions a number of scholars who have described most of us as having turned ourselves into commodities being sold in the 
various markets of society. Our success then becomes dependent on how successful we are
 in marketing ourselves. Are we concerned, she asks, on exactly how to package 
ourselves to more easily sell  ourselves? The social networking world especially, she is suggesting, have turned their members into capital--selling them to advertisers, for a price.
However,
 the principle problem that lies behind this use of the consumer, as she
 sees it, is that the person I am,  that God has made me to be  becomes changed and distorted by what we possess and consume. 
Using a line picked up from a poet that "we are all originals and we die
 copies," she urges us not to catch the 'desire for riches disease', and
 succumb to the mass hypnosis  of society and lose who we are. 
But
 who am I? Really?  What is my identity?  How do other people see me? 
God made me according to his image.  He wanted us to 
cultivate and take care of this earth. And sister hopes that we will 
always keep this identity we have been given. Each of us is an original 
and should not  give it up for any copy, no matter how temporarily 
alluring and economically profitable it may be. 
 
 
No matter if some one searches for his vital thing, therefore he/she wants to be available that in detail, thus that thing is maintained over here.
ReplyDeleteMy page: is garcinia cambogia safe